Book answers age-old questions on what our genetic structure tells us about our bodies
Evolution: Coming out of the Cave
Published: October 8, 2009
Modified: October 16, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Modified: October 16, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Do you have skeletons in your closet? Maybe not, but you definitely have cavemen (or cavewomen) in your genes, say evolutionary researchers.
In fact, though less hairy and more vocal, modern people aren’t much different than our prehistoric predecessors, said Dr. William Meller, a Santa Barbara, Calif., internist who researches and teaches evolutionary medicine. In his book, "Evolution Rx: A Practical Guide to Harnessing Our Innate Capacity for Health and Healing,” Meller addresses in layman’s terms the latest research in genetics, biology and early human history and what it reveals about preventing modern disease, fighting infections and how people evolved from who we were 1 million years ago to who we are today.Multimedia
More Info
Dirt and DNA among keys to history
You may be wondering how scientists can know so much about people who lived thousands, even millions, of years ago.
Dr. William Meller, author of "Evolution Rx: A Practical Guide to Harnessing Our Innate Capacity for Health and Healing,” said the evidence comes from various sources: paleontology, archaeology, anthropology and molecular genetics. Sites of caves where people lived for tens of thousands of years are treasure troves for scientists. By dissecting the dirt on cave floors molecule by molecule, they can learn much about the former inhabitants. By studying modern people living in societies that have changed little over thousands of years, scientists get a glimpse into how primitive societies lived. "Other missing links lie hidden within us, tightly wound in our DNA,” Meller writes. "These coils hold the genetic code — a detailed record of our evolutionary history, a living testament that binds us to our most primitive ancestors.” — Heather Warlick-Moore
You may be wondering how scientists can know so much about people who lived thousands, even millions, of years ago.
Dr. William Meller, author of "Evolution Rx: A Practical Guide to Harnessing Our Innate Capacity for Health and Healing,” said the evidence comes from various sources: paleontology, archaeology, anthropology and molecular genetics. Sites of caves where people lived for tens of thousands of years are treasure troves for scientists. By dissecting the dirt on cave floors molecule by molecule, they can learn much about the former inhabitants. By studying modern people living in societies that have changed little over thousands of years, scientists get a glimpse into how primitive societies lived. "Other missing links lie hidden within us, tightly wound in our DNA,” Meller writes. "These coils hold the genetic code — a detailed record of our evolutionary history, a living testament that binds us to our most primitive ancestors.” — Heather Warlick-Moore
Gossip is in your genes
Perhaps the most primitive form of communication, gossip was as important to our Stone Age ancestors as it is to modern people, Meller says.
In general, people have a great capacity for judging trustworthiness and honesty. In evolutionary medicine, when researchers find capabilities that people are very good at and spend a lot of time on, they look for reasons that skill might have been important in earlier times and been selected to evolve.
And most people are excellent at gossip, whether they admit it or not, Meller said.
"Interestingly enough, if you go back to one of the earliest written records that we have, the Ten Commandments, that record states ‘Thou shalt not bear false witness.’ It doesn’t say anything about bearing true witness. And this is gossip,” Meller said.
In general, gossip is looked at as a bad thing. But Meller contends gossip can be good because it tells us the limits of our society.
"It tells us who’s good and who’s bad, who we can trust, who’s going to cut and run when we really need them,” Meller said. "That’s what the real subject is. It’s all about sex, and it’s all about trustworthiness.”
How did cave people gossip? They likely spoke a rudimentary language with only about 1,000 words. "Ursprache” is the name scientists have given to one hypothetical primitive language. With only a basic vocabulary, Meller said, Stone Age people could communicate what they needed to know such as who was sleeping with whom, who got the bigger piece of meat, who stole food from whom and who was the dominant male.
Me Tarzan, you Jane
The image of a caveman dragging his woman off to his lair by her hair may not be completely accurate, but in the same way many modern women find themselves attracted to the wrong guys, many cavewomen loved the bad cavemen.
A man’s ability to provide was one of the biggest turn-ons for primitive women, Meller said. If he could provide her with a nice juicy hunk of meat every day, it didn’t matter to most cavewomen how he got it.
"Stealing back then meant stealing food,” he said. "There wasn’t much else to steal. So, ‘bad’ really meant that you were willing to break the rules a little bit. And if the female believed that you were going to break the rules in order to help her survive by feeding her, that was OK.”
Though much has changed since the Stone Age, Meller said these lingering genetic codes could explain the attraction some women feel for men that may not be good for them.
Of course, looks mattered, too. Primitive attractions such as physique, strength and a forceful nature played a huge rule in the process of sexual selection.
"Researching attraction attracts researchers,” Meller writes. Studies show the strongest attraction in both sexes is the waist-to-hip ratio. In women, a curvy 7-10 ratio is most desirable. In men, it’s a less-pronounced 9-10 ratio.
Cavewoman’s health
This may not make all you pregnant women feel any less queasy, but Meller provides logical reasoning for morning sickness: It’s your genes’ way of screaming, "Don’t eat that toxic plant!”
About 15 years ago, theoretical biologist Margie Profet figured out that "nausea in early pregnancy is not some counterproductive mistake causing the pregnant mother to starve but rather a safeguard for the delicate, early fetus, protecting it from the dicey diet of the Stone Age.”
While adult cavewomen could handle their diets filled with toxins and bacteria, a developing fetus couldn’t.
Cavewomen spent much of their lives pregnant, scientists believe. They likely became pregnant as soon as they started ovulating. When they weren’t pregnant, they were breast-feeding, and their bodies were preparing to become pregnant again. So, having a period was a rare and unusual thing, Meller said.
In fact, scientists estimate that Stone Age women only had about 20 periods their entire lives compared with about 400 for modern women.
Meller asserts that having fewer periods meant cavewomen had fewer incidences of gynecologic cancers.
"Each time a cell is stimulated to grow and divide and multiply, there is the risk that will go awry in some way, and since there are millions and millions of cells in the breast and the uterus, occasionally the stimulation will cause one cell to become cancerous,” he said. He said this is evident in many modern tribal cultures in which women have fewer cancers.
Meller’s intention in writing "Evolution Rx” was to educate people on their genetic origins, enabling them to determine whether new fad diets, alternative medicine practices and other questionable practices are reasonable.
"For me, as a physician having practiced for 25 years, I’ve seen all kinds of stuff come and go; as much from the orthodox medical pharmaceutical establishment as from every other alternative, much of which was a waste of time, money or even harmful,” he said. "By looking back at where our bodies evolved ... it gives me some standard to judge things by.”
Related Topics:
Culture and Lifestyle, Science and Technology, Health and Fitness, Medicine, Pregnancy and Childbirth, Sciences, Life Sciences, Cancer, Family, Biology, Genetics, Skin Cancer


Prev




Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
--
I will not condemn you for believing, and you can spout all the hate for non-believers that you wish to.
The basis for religion is just theoretical, and correlations can be found using any random sampling of religious beliefs from almost anywhere in the world.
It is my great pleasure to believe in the Lord, and I have accepted Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. I will not condemn you for not believing, and You can spout all the hate for the Lord God that you wish to. I will pray for your souls, as they are in a serious position. If you are right, then there is no harm no foul, but if you are wrong, well,Bye Bye..
I would like to add that the speculation involved in these theories, are just that,speculation. The basis for the findings on the DNA are just theoretical, and correlations can be found using any random sampling of dirt from almost anywhere in the world. As our skin cells become dust and float on the air that surrounds us , they deposit themselves in the dirt and on everything on the face of the planet. These theories described in this book, are almost as wild as Eric Von Danikens' Chariots of the Gods...
Cave people (especially women) also didn't live very long, as I understand it. That may explain the low incidence of cancer. Also, I'm sure there was a lot more survival of the fittest. The high infant mortality probably "helped" also. Come to think of it, what evidence is there that there WASN'T much cancer?
Maybe I'll get the book and read it.
"Evolution" was mentioned in this article a dozen times or so, they'll want to make sure the book is banned and burned from schools because it doesn't rant about creationism......