Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

10th Amendment: Can it help rescue country?

By Cal Thomas    Comments Comment on this article9
Published: November 3, 2009

Does the U.S. Constitution stand for anything in an era of government excess? Can that founding document, which is supposed to restrain the power and reach of a centralized federal government, slow down the juggernaut of czars, health insurance overhaul and anything else this administration and Congress wish to do that is not in the Constitution?

Advertisement

The Framers created a limited government, thus ensuring individuals would have the opportunity to become all that their talents and persistence would allow. The left has put aside the original Constitution in favor of a "living document” that they believe allows them to do whatever they want and demand more tax dollars with which to do it.

Can they be stopped? Some constitutional scholars think the 10th Amendment offers the best opportunity. It states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

In 1939, the Supreme Court began to dilute constitutional language so that it became open to broader interpretation. Rob Natelson, professor of Constitutional Law and Legal History at the University of Montana, has written that even before Franklin Roosevelt’s court-packing scheme, it was changing the way the Constitution was interpreted, especially, "how the commerce and taxing powers were turned upside-down, the necessary and proper clauses and incidental powers, the false claim that the Supreme Court is conservative, how bad precedent leads to more bad court rulings, state elections as critical for constitutional activists, and more.”

While during the last seven decades the court has tolerated the federal welfare state, Natelson says it has never, except in wartime, "authorized an expansion of the federal scope quite as large as what is being proposed now. And in recent years, both the Court and individual justices — even ‘liberal’ justices — have said repeatedly that there are boundaries beyond which Congress may not go.”

It would be nice to know now what those boundaries are and whether Congress is exceeding its powers as it prepares to alter one-sixth of our economy and change how we access health insurance and health care.

Fascinating argument
Natelson makes a fascinating argument in his essay, "Is ObamaCare Constitutional?” using the Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973. In Roe, he writes, the court struck down state abortion laws that "intruded into the doctor-patient relationship. But the intrusion invalidated in Roe was insignificant compared to the massive intervention contemplated by schemes such as HB 3200. ‘Global budgeting’ and ‘single-payer’ plans go even further, and seem clearly to violate the Supreme Court’s Substantive Due Process rules.”

Constitutional Attorney John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, tells me, "Although the states surrendered many of their powers to the new federal government, they retained a residuary and inviolable sovereignty that is reflected throughout the Constitution’s text. The Framers rejected the concept of a central government that would act upon and through the States, and instead designed a system in which the State and federal governments would exercise concurrent authority over the people. The Court’s jurisprudence makes clear that the federal government may not compel the states to enact or administer a federal regulatory program.”

Lawyers are busy writing language only they can understand that seeks to circumvent the intentions of the Founders. But it will be difficult to circumvent the last four words of the 10th Amendment, which state unambiguously where ultimate power lies.

Americans who believe their government should not be a giant ATM, dispensing money and benefits to people who have not earned them, and who want their country returned to its founding principles, must now exercise that power before it is taken from them. The 10th Amendment is one place to begin. The streets are another. It worked for the left.

TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Don't Pay For School - Free Scholarships
Sign Up For Your Free Guide To $38 Million In Scholarships.
ProgramAdvisor.com/FreeScholarships

Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Rates from $30 / Month
Health-Insurance-Quotes.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





both parties ignore the laws, they are only for us lower class citizens to obey and keep them in office by giving our approval to their unlawful ways, which we would go to jail for. most of the people in washington could not make it anywhere else but on the gov dole. can anyone remember the last pres that had a real job before he became pres?
Gary, Oklahoma City - Nov 4, 2009 at 9:33 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Gary
Regarding wartime, Bush/Cheney endeavored to launch us into a permanent state of wartime with ZERO efforts to pay for same. War has become America's overall excuse for its shortcomings.
Bob - Nov 3, 2009 at 1:20 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bob
And the government should not be continually running deficit budgets, which it has with a vengence since 1981. State's rights went by the wayside in 1861, under the one of history's most popular presidents.
Bob - Nov 3, 2009 at 12:28 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bob
To see just how shallow Mr. Cal Thomas's message is..."While during the last seven decades the court has tolerated the federal welfare state, Natelson says it has never, except in wartime, "authorized an expansion of the federal scope quite as large as what is being proposed now."

I DO believe we are in wartime, Mr. Thomas. It's obvious that you think US soldiers dying in Iraq & Afghanistan mean nothing.
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Nov 3, 2009 at 10:28 am
Ha, Ha. This guy cracks me up. There is no "left" nor "right" when it comes to the 10th Admendment. Both parties in DC have gutted the 10th in the name of outright blackmail and control.

How? By taking states taxes then blackmailing them into passing laws in order to get any of the taxes back to the very state that collected them.

Both parties are partly responsible for gutting the 4th (unreasonable search and seizure) as well. But Consertatives really love to subvert the Constitution by means of the chopped-liver 4th.
L, Snhawnee - Nov 3, 2009 at 8:34 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore L
10th Amendment"Thou Shalt Stop Global Warming"....Good News from Tulsa: – Tulsa Mayor Kathy Taylor and her staff have sent a strong educational message to Oklahoma school administrators, teachers and students. With the alliance of Global NES, Inc. Headquarters, Global NES-Oklahoma and Kaizen Renewable Energy (A Global NES Affiliate), the city of Tulsa recently embarked on a School Wind Program that is 100% funded by outside sources. Kaizen Renewable Energy CEO/owner, Lisa Randolph, who was raised in Tulsa, introduced the program to the city of Tulsa to raise awareness and educate students on how utilizing renewable energy resources will positively impact their future world.
The School Wind Program is the brainchild of Global NES, Inc., an international renewable energy firm specializing in large scale projects for commercial applications, non-profits and municipalities. They are donating a wind turbine and curriculum to Hamilton Middle School under their local Oklahoma State Affiliate, Tulsa:
Jean, Fort Gibson - Nov 3, 2009 at 8:33 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jean
Just more old white men trying to relive a childhood that only existed in their imagination. I have news for everyone. The civil war has been over since 1865 and the federal government won, so deal with it.
dappiesdad, dappiesplace - Nov 3, 2009 at 7:50 am
While I agree with this writer. The train has left the station a long time ago. It is hard to argue that a national health care system is unconstitutional what we have had one for people over 62 for over 70 years.
Mr. G, Midwest City - Nov 3, 2009 at 7:32 am
Let us know when the shuttle lands dork.
David, Norman - Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 am

    News Photo Galleriesview all