A-F grading system reflects poverty in Oklahoma schools

Educators say the new A-F school evaluation system is more a reflection of poverty than the quality of schools. Data from the U.S. Census and statistics of free and reduced-price lunch rates prove that theory.
BY CARRIE COPPERNOLL ccoppernoll@opubco.com Published: February 25, 2013

An analysis by The Oklahoman shows a correlation between poverty and the A-F school evaluation system.

While high-poverty school districts can be found in each of the A-F categories, trends emerge when looking at the statewide student population.

Schools with high grades have lower poverty rates than schools on the bottom end of the spectrum.

Students who attend A school districts have a free and reduced-price lunch rate of 33 percent, compared to 85 percent of students in D school districts, according to state data. For a family of four, the annual household income threshold for free lunch is about $29,000.

Data from the U.S. Census shows a similar trend. A school districts have a poverty rate of about 11 percent, while D school districts report a poverty rate of 30 percent.

For Census figures, a family of four is considered to be in poverty with an annual household income of about $23,000.

There is a relationship between affluence and high grades, said Maridyth McBee, assistant superintendent for accountability and assessment for the state Education Department.

That correlation is “probably not that hard to understand given that there are so many benefits of having more resources and lots of opportunities to learn than if you come from abject poverty when everything is on the schools,” McBee said. “There's a longer way to go.”

Nevertheless, the grades highlight schools that are doing well and schools that need more support, she said.

“There's a challenge, especially with poverty schools,” McBee said. “We need to have all hands on deck. How can we help them improve?”

Is poverty an excuse?

Low expectations are unacceptable for any student, regardless of economic status, State Superintendent of Schools Janet Barresi said.

“The point (of A-F) is to shine a light on how kids are doing,” Barresi said. “We're reporting this around on one stable number: proficiency. Regardless of if they're in poverty or not, we need to shine a light.”

Barresi has said often that education is a ticket out of poverty. But, she said, some people use poverty statistics as an excuse for inadequate performance.

“Those opposed to A-F can twist it around,” Barresi said. “They throw up their hands and go back to their offices and close the door. That's not acceptable. Children in poverty have special challenges, so how are we going to get them to proficiency?”

Continue reading this story on the...


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Kevin Durant respects David Ash walking away from football
  2. 2
    KOKI: Tulsa man uses Craigslist in search of lost raccoon
  3. 3
    Census: Marriage rate at 93-year low, even including same sex couples
  4. 4
    Panel Urges Overhauling Health Care at End of Life
  5. 5
    Hollywood Scion Jack Huston Cast in 'Ben-Hur' Remake
+ show more