Administration urges terror surveillance renewal

 
No Author Published: September 11, 2012    Comment on this article Leave a comment

photo -   A man fixes an American flag that was fallen from the position during a ceremony marking the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks at the National September 11 Memorial at the World Trade Center site in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/The New York Times, Chang W. Lee)
A man fixes an American flag that was fallen from the position during a ceremony marking the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks at the National September 11 Memorial at the World Trade Center site in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/The New York Times, Chang W. Lee)

Multimedia

Some members of Congress have suggested that the law contains a loophole that enables intelligence-gathering on U.S. citizens.

"I strongly take exception to the suggestion that there is a 'loophole,'" James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said in a letter to 11 Senate Democrats and two Senate Republicans on Aug. 24.

The law prohibits "reverse targeting — targeting a person located outside the United States as a pretext when the real goal is to target a person inside the United States."

On Tuesday night, Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said the DNI's Aug. 24 response does not sufficiently address Udall's concerns regarding "the possibility of unauthorized surveillance of Americans." Wyden criticized the lack of "even a ballpark estimate of how many Americans have had their communications collected under this law."

Asked at the news briefing about the program's successes, Litt said that the ability to collect certain kinds of communications that cannot be gathered any other way is "incredibly helpful." He said that being more specific would signal to the targets of the surveillance what was being collected.

In July, the administration acknowledged in a rare disclosure that the program had exceeded legal limits on at least one occasion, but that the problem had been remedied. The ODNI made the comment in a letter to Wyden, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

On at least one occasion, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court held that an intelligence collection effort was "unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment" requirement to obtain a court warrant, Wyden said at the time.

In response, the intelligence office said that Wyden's statements "may convey an incomplete and potentially misleading understanding" of what is at issue.

Litt said he had met with Wyden, talked through the issues and that the ODNI was prepared to continue doing that.

"If a problem develops, we fix it," Litt said of the program.

Page 2 of 2




If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.


New Rule in WASHINGTON:
(MAY 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Must Read This Immediately
www.ConsumerFinanceDaily.com
Leukemia Symptoms
You May Have Leukemia & Not Know It. Learn About Signs & Symptoms Now.
evergreen4cure.com

News Photo Galleriesview all