Not all adoptions done through an attorney are bad. Dierdre McCool, executive director of the Deaconess Pregnancy and Adoption Services, wants to make that clear from the beginning.
But state law has different regulations for adoptions through an agency versus one done by an attorney, leaving the system ripe for abuse, she said. That's something she hopes to change next year.
McCool is hoping, with the help of other adoption advocates, to push through legislation that would call for attorneys to meet certain requirements before facilitating a child's adoption.
The Department of Human Services has a code that adoption agencies must follow, but it does not apply to attorneys.
They may not have bureaucratic DHS regulations, but several attorneys said they have harsh disciplinary rules in place to deal with abuses within their own practice, and to say their industry is unregulated is false.
Regulations for agencies
•They are prohibited from coercing birth parents into adoption. Also, they must have provisions in place to avoid conflicts of interest among the birth parents, adopting parents and the adoption agency.
•They must help the birth parents reach a decision on plans for the child, while also helping them learn what it would take to meet their child's physical, emotional and financial needs.
•They must document all expenses paid on behalf of the birth parents by the adoptive parents and must seek court approval for anything over the statutory limit of $500.
•They must provide an education element, including how to cope with a child's psychological needs related to the child's racial, ethnic or cultural background, how to help the child understand adoption and how to give the birth parents' perspective in the process.
•They must set an agreement regarding any adoption fees and a schedule of payments. Postadoption services also must be provided by an adoption agency to all involved.
Regulations for attorneys
The law requires attorneys to do a preplacement home study, and a postplacement visit as well. But there is no oversight to ensure attorneys are following that law, whereas adoption agencies are reviewed at least twice a year by DHS for license renewal, McCool said.
Though McCool would like to see the law changed so attorneys have to follow the same procedures as agencies, she said her main legislative goal this year will be requiring more cost disclosure up front, regardless of who is facilitating the adoption.
More than a year ago, a state grand jury criticized Oklahoma County adoption judges for being "indifferent or grossly incompetent” in overseeing expenses paid to birth mothers in exchange for putting their children up for adoption. The grand jury said that birth mothers essentially had been allowed to sell children for cars, televisions and vacations.
When the report was released in May 2006, the jury called for the Legislature to strengthen the definitions of allowable expenses.
Lawmaker seeks changes
Rep. Susan Winchester, an adoptive mom, said she plans to introduce legislation calling for an adoption reform committee. The Oklahoma Adoption Code was last substantially changed in 1997, she said, and needs a fresh look.
She wants to ensure the laws are adoption-friendly, but also that they are in the best interest of all the involved parties, especially the child.
The task force will be able to analyze those regulations and make a recommendation to see if they need to be more broadly applied, she said.
Winchester, whose husband James Winchester is the chief justice for the Oklahoma Supreme Court, said she also would like to see the Oklahoma Bar Association offer a continuing education class on adoption law, to serve as a refresher course for adoption attorneys.