Appeals court ruling in OG&E case is disappointing

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Published: November 4, 2013

A decision last week by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was disappointing, and not simply because it ultimately could result in higher electric bills for customers of Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

The full court on Thursday denied OG&E's (and the state's) appeal of a ruling this summer by a three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit. In that 2-1 ruling, judges said the federal Environmental Protection Agency had the authority to reject Oklahoma's pollution-control plan for dealing with sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-burning power plants, and that the EPA could impose a more stringent and far more costly plan.

The case stems from the EPA's determination in 2010 that visibility at wildlife refuges in Oklahoma showed the presence of pollution, or “regional haze,” from coal-fired power plants. The state produced a plan to reduce those emissions; the EPA said it wasn't adequate — no surprise, given that the Obama administration is intent on putting coal out of business.

That goal is shared by the Sierra Club and other groups that were allowed to intervene. Coal is first on their list. Natural gas is next. If it's a fossil fuel, it's a target.

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Do you have a decisive marriage?
  2. 2
    Tsarnaev sister arrested in New York City; threatened victim with bomb
  3. 3
    'Sopranos' Creator Says His Quotes About Tony's Fate Were 'Misconstrued'
  4. 4
    Tom Brokaw, execs fuming over NBC chief's remark
  5. 5
    Diane Sawyer Says Goodbye To 'World News'
+ show more