Appeals court ruling in OG&E case is disappointing

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: November 4, 2013
Advertisement
;

OG&E continues to weigh its options, including a potential appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Meantime there's a 2018 deadline to get into compliance. Doing so will entail spending about $1.2 billion to install emission-control technology, called scrubbers, which could raise electricity rates by 15 percent.

We can't shake the opinion of dissenting Justice Paul Kelly, who in the original 2-1 ruling called the EPA's rejection of Oklahoma's plan “arbitrary and capricious.” There was no evidence, Kelly wrote, that the investment needed to comply with the federal rules “will have any effect whatsoever on air quality. It surely will, however, result in adverse changes to what Oklahoma ratepayers pay for electricity.”

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    FDA announces rules restricting e-cigarettes and cigars
  2. 2
    'Time' unveils its 100 most influential people list
  3. 3
    Michael Phelps on comeback: 'I'm doing this for me'
  4. 4
    Did One Direction Plagiarise Their Latest Music Video?
  5. 5
    Here's How To Stop Videos From Automatically Playing On Your Facebook Feed
+ show more