Tribal land dispute nears end
Tribes: Cheyenne-Arapaho officials say the Fort Reno property belongs to them
Federal judge expected this year to settle case in which U.S. military says it is legal owner o

 
By Judy Gibbs Robinson | Published: January 2, 2007   

EL RENO — A decades-old dispute between the Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma and the federal government regarding ownership of old Fort Reno could be resolved this year.

Advertisement


Fort Reno timeline
Government documents, some dating back to the late 19th century, tell this history of the disputed land:

•1869: A presidential order created a 5-million-acre Cheyenne-Arapaho Reservation in western Oklahoma.

•1883: Another presidential order withdrew 9,000 acres to be used for "military purposes exclusively,” leading to Fort Sill's creation.

•1890: The tribes agreed to cede lands comprising the 1869 reservation except for what was allotted to individual tribal members.

•1908: The cavalry abandoned Fort Sill, which continued to be used as a "remount station” to raise and train horses and mules for the military.

•1948: The War Department transferred jurisdiction to the U.S. Department of Agriculture for a research station, which still operates.

Source: Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma vs. United States of America, Civil Action No. 06-519

Absent unexpected delays, a federal judge in Washington will decide if the government wrongfully took about 7,000 acres of Cheyenne-Arapaho land surrounding the abandoned fort or if the tribes ceded all claims to the land and were compensated for it.

With ownership comes the right to develop the land for shopping, offices and possibly a casino and to drill for known oil and gas reserves, Cheyenne-Arapaho Gov. Darrell Flyingman said.

"It's valuable land. There's hundreds of oil and gas wells right around Fort Reno. That's one of the reasons they're trying to keep it,” Flyingman said.

Development planned
Already the tribes have shown the land to builders and developers, including a group from California and Washington, D.C., who toured it Wednesday.

"We want to bring jobs to western Oklahoma — good-paying jobs,” Flyingman said.

Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa, has different plans for the site. He co-sponsored a bill last session to authorize the Agriculture Department secretary to open the land to oil and gas exploration.

"The bill simply allows USDA to lease the property, while at the same time allowing some of the funds from the leasing to be put toward renovating and maintaining the historic buildings at Fort Reno,” Inhofe said in a statement in November.

‘Big fight on our hands'
The proposed Fort Reno Mineral Leasing Act died when the 109th Congress adjourned Dec. 9, but Flyingman suspects it will be re-introduced in the coming session.

"We have a big fight on our hands. We're taking on the Oklahoma delegation plus the oil companies,” he said.

The latest salvo in the legal battle came Friday, when the tribes' lawyers filed an 18-page response to the government's motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

That document and others filed previously outline a case that spans more than 100 years, starting in 1869 when the Cheyenne-Arapaho were moved from Colorado onto 5 million acres west of Oklahoma City.

Page 1 of 2


NewsOK has disabled the comments for this article.
See our commenting and posting policy.

Ads by Yahoo!

New Rule in PENNSYLVANIA:
(APR 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Must Read This Immediately
www.ConsumerFinanceDaily.com
Mortgage Rates Hit 2.50%
If you owe under $729k you may qualify for 2.90% APR Govt Refi Plans.
www.SeeRefinanceRates.com

News Photo Galleriesview all