Senator, Bush at odds over public works
Comments
0
By Chris Casteel
Published: August 12, 2007
WASHINGTON — On issues such as taxes, the war in Iraq and stem cell research, Sen. Jim Inhofe backs President Bush all the way. In fact, Inhofe, R-Tulsa, once said he agrees with the president "99 percent of the time.”
Advertisement
His spending priorities
In recent debate on the Water Resources Development Act and on the highway bill two years ago, Inhofe repeatedly defended spending on public works.
"I am coming from a conservative perspective,” he said in a speech two weeks ago on the Senate floor, adding that he had been ranked as the most conservative senator by the American Conservative Union.
"Yet I am saying to you there are two things we ought to be spending money on in this country: One is national defense and the other is infrastructure.
"We have a crisis in our infrastructure. The big bill on transportation infrastructure we passed (in 2005) is going to do nothing more than maintain what we have now. And it is anticipated in 20 years we will increase our traffic by 50 percent. What are we going to do?”
Inhofe clashed with the president on that highway bill. Inhofe wanted a $318 billion bill. Bush at first said he would veto anything over $256 billion, though he ultimately accepted $286 billion.
"This is a bill that is a matter of life and death,” Inhofe said of the legislation, during one of his lengthy speeches warning about the nation's crumbling roads and bridges.
For his part, Inhofe secured more than $200 million combined for the I-40 Crosstown bridge project in Oklahoma City and the widening of I-44 in Tulsa. He also got more money dedicated annually for the state's transportation needs, including bridges.
Inhofe isn't the only conservative who backed the highway bill. It passed overwhelmingly in both houses.
And the water projects bill he has spent years working on was approved easily in the House and is expected to have strong bipartisan support in the Senate next month.
Inhofe contends the White House's opposition to the water resources bill is political, while critics of the bill contend the projects in the bill were chosen by lawmakers looking for political gains back home.
In an interview, Inhofe said the White House should wait to voice objections to projects that actually make it into spending bills.
The bill, he said, includes many projects that met certain criteria, but not all of them should ultimately be funded. What the bill does, though, he said, is establish the authority of the congressional committees with expertise — rather than the appropriators, those who allocate the money — to determine which water and sewer projects make the grade.
That, Inhofe said, is the conservative approach.
He told the Senate, "During the August recess, you are going to hear this person, who is rated the most conservative member of this body, out talking all over the nation why this is the conservative approach to logically authorize these projects and then determine which ones are worthwhile.”
Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Related Topics:
Science and Technology, Domestic Policy, Political Policy, Politics, U.S. Politics, Civil Engineering, Engineering, Transportation Policy



Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.