Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

How the Cherokee Nation case may affect civil rights
How the Cherokee Nation case may affect civil rights

By Larry Levy    Comments Comment on this article6
Published: August 21, 2007
Modified: August 22, 2007 at 10:14 am

TULSA — The controversial status of freedmen in the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma was characterized as the "most significant civil rights movement of this century” at a town hall meeting headed by a member of the California congressional delegation.

Rep. Diane Watson, D-Calif., introduced a bill that would cut off federal funding — about $300 million a year — to the Cherokee Nation unless it restores citizenship to freedmen.

In a March 3 special election, 77 percent of about 8,000 Cherokees who voted decided to strip the freedmen of citizenship.

About 150 people attended the meeting in the Rudisill Regional Library, most to support the bill introduced by Watson.

The Watson entourage included, by her request, at least three members of the U.S. Capitol police force, a congressional agency.

Two uniformed Tulsa police officers also were at the meeting.

Treaty violation?
Watson said actions resulting from the March election were in violation of an 1866 treaty and for that reason, the United States should not be providing funds to the Cherokee Nation.

"The law says we can't use U.S. dollars to violate the law,” Watson said. American money can't be used to "discriminate.”

The California representative told the group the only way to resolve this issue is to "return to full status” the freedmen.

In response
Chad Smith, principal chief of the Cherokee Nation, said later in a telephone interview that the proper place to settle the issue is in the courts, where there are three lawsuits pending in federal courts and one in a Cherokee tribal court.

Until those lawsuits are settled, the freedmen retain previous rights and benefits in the Cherokee Nation. Smith said if the lawsuits support the election, the Cherokee Nation will help the freedmen transfer to other health care providers and ongoing treatment will "absolutely” continue.

Passage of the bill would eliminate 6,500 jobs at Cherokee casinos and other businesses with a payroll of more than $184 million.

Federal funds are used for health, housing and education, Smith said.

Income from tribal businesses is divided, with 70 percent going into reinvestment and 30 percent to augment social programs and also to fund community projects such as roads and water systems.

Verdie Triplett of the Choctaw-Chickasaw freedmen association, said historically, the black congressional caucus has always supported tribes in getting federal money.

"Congress is the only locomotive monster they respect,” Triplett said. It is not a freedman issue "but an American issue because all Americans pay taxes,” he said.

David Cornsilk said the March vote was illegal and "should have never happened.”

Watson was scheduled to hold a similar forum Monday night in Muskogee.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Refinance Now at 4.25% Fixed
No hidden fees-4.4% APR! No obligation. Get 4 free quotes. No SSN req.
MortgageRefinance.LendGo.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





the congress woman from california wants to talk about treaty breaking???? what about the treaties our native people signed and then to be turned around and forced out of our land and our enviornment to be moved to places that aren't familiar to us!!!! the freedmen are NOT Native American, they were just african americans taken in under native american's wings. it wouldn't be fair for freedmen to have native american status when the caucasion people can't even get the benefits of the native americans. why should the freedmen??????
lisa, Oklahoma city - Aug 22, 2007 at 9:06 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore lisa
As an American Indian, I don't believe that we should have to recognize the freedmen as tribal members because they AREN'T tribal members. Tribes took in the freedmen because we were good people and wanted to help them out, but they were never actually full fledged tribal members. Being as such, I don't believe that their descendants should receive the same benefits as someone who is a direct descendant of an actual member of the tribe. It isn't about having to share money with the freedmen. It's about recognizing who is truly a tribe member and who isn't.
Kelli, Del City - Aug 22, 2007 at 12:26 am
Freedmen are the descendants of slaves who were the property of the various tribes of IT/OT. At emancipation, these slaves and their descendants became citizens of the various tribes, and not fully US citizens.
Ellen, Alexandria - Aug 21, 2007 at 3:49 pm
define freedman, please!!
Joan, Washingotn - Aug 21, 2007 at 3:09 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Joan
"Why is a Cal. congresswoman meddling here in Oklahoma?"
Because the Oklahoma congressional congregation do not care.
Paul, Tecumseh - Aug 21, 2007 at 11:10 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Paul
If this passes, then all federal funds will have to be withheld for states for other offenses, such as not following our Constitutional Rights,(for instance okdhs, child support, etc.) Why is a Cal. congresswoman meddling here in Oklahoma?
Amy, Chelsea - Aug 21, 2007 at 10:00 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Amy

    News Photo Galleriesview all