Letters to the editor: Saturday, September 1, 2007
Letters to the editor: Saturday, September 1, 2007

Comments Comment on this article8

Published: September 1, 2007

Ample reason for Congress to investigate
"Watson's view; Congresswoman states her case” (Our Views, Aug. 23) included the well-worn argument that Congress should hold off on looking at the Cherokee freedmen issue until legal challenges are allowed to play out in court. Cherokee Principal Chief Chad Smith has made this point the centerpiece of his public relations campaign to disenfranchise the freedmen descendants. He reminds us that the Cherokee Nation is a nation of laws and that it will abide by the decisions of the courts.

Advertisement

But the past actions of Smith belie his commitment to the rule of law. After the Cherokee Nation's tribal courts ruled in favor of Lucy Allen, a freedmen descendant who sued for citizenship, Smith chose to dissolve the court and pack the newly constituted court with his cronies, who proceeded to approve a referendum to overturn Allen's petition.

The Cherokee Nation receives roughly $300 million a year in U.S. taxpayer funds. It is also the beneficiary of a lucrative federal gaming charter. Congress, in addition to its lawmaking duties, has oversight authority on how federal programs are administered. Smith's failure to abide by the rule of law is ample reason for Congress to take a closer and independent look at the activities of the Cherokee Nation.

U.S. Rep. Diane E. Watson,

Washington, D.C.

Watson, a Democrat, represents a congressional district in southern California.

Not trustworthy
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has said if he's elected president he'll work with Republicans such as Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. At the end of the day, Obama is pro-abortion. He is anti-Second Amendment and has a socialist agenda, just like Sen. Hillary Clinton. At the end of the day, Oklahomans can't trust him; Coburn shouldn't either.

Eddie Rich, Moore

No cause for shame
I'm sick of people saying "liberal” as if it's a bad word or an insult. Our Founding Fathers created this country and its government based on the ideology of liberalism founded in the 18th century. This ideology places basic human rights above all else. Jesus was, according to most accounts, fond of the ideas behind tolerance and basic human and civil rights. This is what it means to be liberal. I served in the Army with many liberal Democrats who were most definitely not anti-America. We proudly served and don't appreciate the implication that liberals are any less patriotic than anyone else.

Next time you bash liberal ideology or use the word "liberal” in a negative way, keep in mind that most of our Founding Fathers were liberals.

Edward Harrison, Oklahoma City

Popular place
Iraq is one of the most fought-over frontiers in the history of the world. Think about it: It's been invaded by the Elamites, Akkadians, Kassites, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Medes, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Parthians, Sassanids, Mongols, Safavids. Ottomans, the British and now Americans.

Doris Patton, Oklahoma City

What a departure
Visiting a home improvement center recently I was pleased to see many items priced at whole amounts such as $10 or $40. What a departure from the accepted $9.95 or $39.99. This weird pricing made sense 50 years ago when the almighty penny fit into the economy of the average family; 79 cents was important in buying a yard of cloth. The most flagrant of all these insults to an educated American is at the gas pump. What is nine-tenths of a cent? Now that we have the highest gas prices in history, wouldn't it be prudent to start calling a penny a penny?

Carl Thompson, Choctaw


 


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford

25 Pounds in 2 Weeks
Fast Easy Weight Loss Breakthrough. As Seen on CNN - Try It Here.
LoseWeightEasily.net

Drop 25 Pounds in 2 Weeks
Fast Easy Weight Loss Breakthrough. As Seen on CNN - Try It Here.
EasilyLoseWeight.net

shareView All

Buzz Up!


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Methinks Mark of ? must be a frequent listener of Michael Savage or some other FOX-worthy talkshow host! Nowhere in UN Sec Coun Res 1441 does it give the US permission to conduct military exercises in Iraq. .. .. . Here is the link, so you can read for yourselves. .. .. .. http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/682/26/PDF/N0268226.pdf?OpenElement .. .. .. ..
As I recall, most of the UN Member States disagreed with the US & coallition forces entering into Iraq to carry out military activities. As for Doug of Hugo, you have your facts backwards. If you research the writings of the founding fathers, you will find that had they been CONSERVATIVE (that is, in agreement that religion belonged in government) we would now be a commonwealth country of the UK.
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Sep 4, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Dorris, I suggest (if you can comprehend) U.N. Security Council Res. 1441 ans see how the WORLD participated in responding to Saddam Hussein's defiance of meeting the terms of the 1991 Gulf War. America DID NOT INVADE ANYBODY despite what a liberal media driven agenda that is spoon fed to uninformed, gullible listeners every day.
Robert, Oklahoma City - Sep 2, 2007 at 9:58 am
Dorris, good observation-- though I'd say that the Akkadians and the Assyrians were already there. And we can imagine that other places would have similarly long lists of invaders, if only they'd developed writing early enough to record their history! But yes, Iraq-- by whatever name it's gone by-- has been through a lot!!
Lance, From OK, now in Upstate New York - Sep 1, 2007 at 11:57 am
Isn't it time to move beyond the AM talk radio canard of saying that Democratic presidential candidates have a "socialist agenda"? Would the Oklahoman ever run a letter asking citizens not to trust Bush and his "fascist agenda"? Such derogatory hyperbole is completely worthless and does nothing to further honest political discussion.
Lance, From OK, now in Upstate New York - Sep 1, 2007 at 11:54 am
I am pleased to see that the Oklahoman printed the letter from the Congresswoman from California, even though frequent readers of the editorial page know the paper strongly disagrees with her position.

Jimmy from OKC: While I support your right to free speech, once again your comments are offensive and make little sense.
Margaret, Holdenville - Sep 1, 2007 at 9:52 am
Eddie Rich of Moore(on): women's choice trumps all laws. Once again, small-minded, hypocritical republican fear mongering. Women't Choice!
Jimmy, Oklahoma City - Sep 1, 2007 at 8:54 am
Not sure what happened to the first part of that last comment, but it was if the founding fathers were the same liberals as today we'd still belong to England!!
Doug, Hydro - Sep 1, 2007 at 7:33 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Doug
Because there would've been no guns and they would've tried to "appease" the british government!!
Doug, Hydro - Sep 1, 2007 at 7:30 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Doug

    News Photo Galleriesview all