Berry Tramel, Sports columnist

Read more columns by Berry Tramel. Or visit Berry's blog

Contact Berry -- E-mail: btramel@opubco.com. Phone: (405) 475-3313.

Tulsa's flashy offense puts up fight; OU finally scores knockout

By Berry Tramel
Published: September 22, 2007

TULSA — You remember the old Yogi Berra line about that restaurant is so crowded, nobody goes there anymore?


Featured Video

Advertisement

College football is getting the same way. Offenses are so unorthodox these days, everybody's doing it. And Tulsa is doing offense very, very well.

Which explains why Oklahoma's 62-21 rout of Tulsa on Friday night — a 41-point verdict on the road, against a team at least in the upper half of OU's 2007 foes — brought relief as much as jubilation.

"Glad to get that behind us,” OU defensive backs coach Bobby Jack Wright said of chasing TU's new-fangled offense and slippery quarterback Paul Smith. "Puts a lot more stress on your defense. I was really glad to get tested.”

North Texas didn't do it. Miami didn't do it. Utah State didn't do it. But Tulsa and coordinator Gus Malzahn's offense, which runs players in motion from every angle and tosses passes from every direction, most definitely tested the Sooners.

And OU passed. Eventually.

"I liked the way it went,” Bob Stoops said. "Defensively, they had us on our heels early a little bit. We settled in in the second half and played well.”

But the first half in River City was trouble. Tulsa flanker Jesse Meyer entered Friday with 11 catches total in 15 career games. By halftime Friday, Meyer had seven catches for 114 yards and was drawing comparisons to Garrett Mills, the TU tight end who stunned the Sooners for 13 catches and 152 yards two years ago at Owen Field.

The first half was a fireworks stand set ablaze. Smith threw for 264 yards (finished with 350). OU tailback Allen Patrick ran for 130 yards (finished with 145). Sudden Sam Bradford threw for 162 yards on 16 throws (finished with 244, on 16-of-22 passing). New favorite receiver Juaquin Iglesias had five catches for 85 yards (finished with eight for 142).

OU led 35-14, and it seemed like it could have been 49-28.

"Very unconventional offense, the different things they do,” Stoops said. "So it was a discipline test.”

The second half was much better. The Sooners allowed 266 total yards on 39 plays in the first half; they allowed 132 yards on 34 plays in the second half. The DBs quit allowing long passes. The pass rush intensified.

OU six times sacked Smith, no small accomplishment considering Smith's quick feet. Auston English had two of the sacks; linebacker Curtis Lofton had 14 tackles.

After Tulsa opened the second half with an 81-yard touchdown drive that cut OU's lead to 35-21, the Sooners gave up just 61 yards the rest of the game.

That's more than acceptable against this Tulsa offense. Smith ranks with Mizzou's Chase Daniel as the best quarterbacks OU will face. Chances are, Tulsa's offense is the best on the whole Sooner schedule, which says a whole lot about TU and a whole lot about Oklahoma & the 11 Pipers Piping.

The Big 12 stinks, in part because it doesn't have enough offenses like Tulsa's. Let's hope Texas A&M fans weren't watching Friday night, else they'll get all lathered up again over the Aggies forgetting what century they are in.

OU most definitely does not stink, and any American interested in the Sooners' status could see that Friday night. The OU offense was not tested — Tulsa is incapable of putting up a fight on defense — but the defense was. And passed.


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford
Bookmark and Share



Comments

Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.

Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on crime or fatality stories.

Leave a comment. Log in below or sign up (it's free).

   
BIG DEAL - TRY BEATING TEXAS TECH - OSU FAN - And then try getting credit from the DAILY Oklahoman.
Robert, ok - Sep 22, 2007 11:31 PM
Report as inappropriate
BIG DEAL - TRY BEATING TEXAS TECH - OSU FAN - And then try getting credit from the DAILY Oklahoman.
Robert, ok - Sep 22, 2007 11:30 PM
Report as inappropriate
At least Bill Curry wasn't doing the game. I get so sick of him constantly repeating himself and poor-mouthing one the teams he is covering. He sucked as a coach and sucks as an announcer.
steve, nicholasville - Sep 22, 2007 9:43 PM
Report as inappropriate
Everybody who thought the coverage was horrible should go to espn.com and file a complaint. Thats what I did. they just might get the message that NOBODY cares about Notre Dame.
Jeff, Edmond - Sep 22, 2007 6:06 PM
Report as inappropriate
the espn crew was horrible..they talked about every team but tu and ou..they stunk
dwayne, blair - Sep 22, 2007 3:47 PM
Report as inappropriate
Does any one know the status of John Williams and whether his injury was serious?
teddy, duluth - Sep 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Report as inappropriate
btw I think the comment on OU and TU are relevant because OSU=Ohio State University FSU= Florida State University OU=Univerisity of Oklahoma?
Brian, Santa Monica - Sep 22, 2007 2:40 PM
Report as inappropriate
Why are so many of you guy's whining? Yeah they were the 4th string, but the person you should be riding is the Producer who feeds the material to them to talk about. The announcers are the mouth piece of the Producer, and regardless of whether we like it or not Notre Dame and Michigan stinking it up is THE NEWS in collage football. Lighten Up or listen or Bob Barry
Brian, Santa Monica - Sep 22, 2007 2:38 PM
Report as inappropriate
i was telling my soninlaw fri. night as we was watching the game,or trying to watch the game. why dont those broadcasters shut ther mouths,and do the game.but it did'nt help,they kept on talking.ESPN needs to find someone else to plan ther programs.that was the worst broadcasting i have ever watched.if OU had not been playing,i would have changed channels.
dusty, tecumseh - Sep 22, 2007 1:49 PM
Report as inappropriate
ESPN clearly has second and third string broadcasters. Last night it became evident they had a fourth string too. Way to go guys. And I love their comment about why it's OU and not UO since it is the University of Oklahoma, and how that's just something they do around here. I guess these jokers never heard of FSU or OSU (the one in Ohio) or CU. And the only reason USC doesn't do it is SCU doesn't have a nice ring to it. :-)
Earl, Oklahoma City - Sep 22, 2007 1:40 PM
Report as inappropriate
We always mute the TV and listen on the radio. Sorry, I know some of you don't live in radio range.
Margaret, Holdenville - Sep 22, 2007 12:31 PM
Report as inappropriate
Here is the ESPN contact information for ESPN. Let them hear the Sooner nation's disappointment!!
Office of the President
ESPN
ESPN Plaza, 935 Middle St.
Bristol, CT 06010

Phone: 860-766-2000
Fax: 860-766-2213
brad, goldsby - Sep 22, 2007 12:19 PM
Report as inappropriate
* broadcast
brad, goldsby - Sep 22, 2007 11:48 AM
Report as inappropriate
AMEN!! I was so disappointed in the broadcrast. They did the same crap with the OSU_Troy game!! WE must Protest ESPN!!!
brad, goldsby - Sep 22, 2007 11:48 AM
Report as inappropriate
Another game.....another Sooner Beatdown. I just hope that LSU slips up somewhere, allowing OU to play USC in New Orleans.
Chris, Jenks - Sep 22, 2007 11:16 AM
Report as inappropriate
I agree on the ND talk. It wouldn't have been so bad had ESPN shown us the action on the field, or, anything other than the talking heads talking about ND. Very poorly done. But at least OU won. Look out Texas.
Ken, Boise - Sep 22, 2007 10:08 AM
Report as inappropriate
Tom, right on. I finally muted it. I'm SO SICK of all the Notre Dame talk. They spent the entire second quarter on them. I hope they win soon so ESPN will SHUT UP about them.
tim - Sep 22, 2007 9:47 AM
Report as inappropriate
How about ESPN 2 and their coverage of Notre Dame's game against Tulsa last night? I didn't even know ND changed their uniforms to look like OU's? I really loved how we missed the beginning of plays because it was important to show us the booth and Lou (in a box to left even during plays) as they discussed the fall of ND. Isn't that what pregame, college gameday, and halftime shows are for? And the sideline reporter C.S....really important stuff there...I can see why we'd need to miss the beginning of plays for that or the ESPN 2 production crew showing us the all important pan of the crowd. The best part was trying to watch the game while players face's and profiles are on the screen with White and Bryd introducing them. This has nothing to do with commercials or the ticker at the bottom of the screen and everything to do with production crews trying to give fans what they don't want in an effort to out do their competitors. The truly sad thing is that FOX Sports is even worse!
Roy, Lewisberry - Sep 22, 2007 9:46 AM
Report as inappropriate
I thought the ESPN2 coverage of the game was horrible. The commentators spent all night talking about everything except the game and missed several interesting plays all together.
Tom, Overland Park - Sep 22, 2007 9:37 AM
Report as inappropriate
It IS uncoventional, Barry... not everyone IS doing it.
Rick, Oklahoma City - Sep 22, 2007 9:00 AM
Report as inappropriate
doug, hollis - Sep 22, 2007 7:54 AM
Report as inappropriate
Sudden Sam = Barry the Bore
Brian, Norman - Sep 22, 2007 4:08 AM
Report as inappropriate