OU notebook
Comments
6
Published: October 14, 2007
Reynolds used sparingly
For the first time this season, Ryan Reynolds didn't need to be a hero on defense.
Advertisement
Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford 

Comments
Leave a comment.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
I consider myself to be one of the biggest OU fans in the world and would love to see calls go our way, but each of the three calls I feel were the right calls. Brown did make contact with the ground, Kelly didn't have control and Iglesias lost the ball before touching the ground (he was too focusing on the guy hitting him from behind). Replay does take to long and gives the other team time to make adjustments while waiting for the replay. The play that should have been reviewed was the Rucker touchdown in the final seconds. That score may have affected the spread and potentially cost us points in some of the polls.
Christopher, Tomball - Oct 15, 2007 11:14 AM
• Report: Offensive language
shirley someone at the ncaa reviews every review. if so, there are probably quite a few ex-review refs based on what i've seen. and it's not just ou that's getting the raw end of this deal, although i'd like to see how many ou plays have been reviewed compared to other schools. maybe they should replay they should put the "indisputable" evidence on the big screen, if the school has one. at least in my day a call was THE call. if you didn't like it you had about 25 seconds to get over it, it didn't interupt the game, it was just part of it. you could aways toss an orange toward the ref at the end of the game. if they can't get it right the ncaa should do away with it.
Otis, Woodward - Oct 15, 2007 9:11 AM
• Report: Offensive language
My question is, why does Stoops have to ask for a review on a questionable turnover, and lose a timeout when the refs questioned an OU pass play (no score - no turnover) without Missouri using their challange or timeout? I agree with Stoops - that is BS. It was a catch by the way.... and there was no way they had indisputable evidence to over-rule the call on the field. Is the guy from the Oregon game back?
Lawerence, Oklahoma City - Oct 14, 2007 10:17 PM
• Report: Offensive language
drop the "review in the booth".I notice that the Sooners come out short on this so far, but so do a lot of other teams. It is a major waste of time, it has an affect on the players and slows the momentum of the game. The NCAA is wrong on this one.
Steve, Ketchum - Oct 14, 2007 5:56 PM
• Report: Offensive language
Good points, Grant. Both calls you referred to were wrongly reversed. I agree that the review process needs to be scrapped, and not just because OU has been repeatedly victimized by it. It's a waste of time, and assuming the refs actually try to get the calls right - the Oregon game last year notwithstanding - blown calls don't occur that frequently.
Rob, Joplin - Oct 14, 2007 5:08 PM
• Report: Offensive language
I haven't seen them yet, but my brother (who is a very fair, even-keeled fan) called after both Chris Brown's "roll over the tackle" and Kelly's "bobble" reviews. He said both should have gone our way, especially if these ref's would abide by the "indisputable evidence" clause. I think when Bob demanded the Iglesias fumble review, what he was actually saying to the refs was, "Why are you only reviewing close plays that could go against us? I think you called this one right, but let's be fair here." We Sooners sure are snake-bit on the review issue. The list just keeps growing. I don't know about other fans, but when officiating is bad, it just feels lousy and unfair... for the whole sport. The guys in stripes need to be better. Review definitely needs to be better, or dropped. It takes tons of time and it doesn't get calls any more correct than the naked eye. Our players need to just execute despite that. Remember a few years ago, when the motto on t-shirts was "FINISH"? Our motto in the locker room ought to be "LEAVE NO DOUBT." We've got to be better than bad refs. We've got to be enough in command that a lucky play or a last second field goal doesn't matter. We weren't against Colorado (we didn't deserve to win anyway). Refs took away Oregon and Texas Tech 2005. OSU 2006 was too close cause we sat on it. Boise State was close enough to win on trickery. But, we were good enough last night. And that's all that matters this year.
Grant, Edmond - Oct 14, 2007 10:13 AM
• Report: Offensive language

