Immigration battle heats up
Immigration battle heats up
Published: October 26, 2007
•Catholics vow to resist measure
Catholic Archbishop Eusebius J. Beltran and a council of priests with the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City have signed a pledge opposing the state's new immigration law. The "Pledge of Resistance” is to be presented to Gov. Brad Henry's office today, an archdiocese spokesman said. "We are making the statement that there is a higher law — a law of charity and helping your fellow man,” said the Rev. Michael Chapman.
NewsOK Related Articles
•Legal challenge revived in Tulsa
A second lawsuit has been filed challenging the immigration legislation in Tulsa federal court. U.S. District Judge James Payne had dismissed a lawsuit against state officials, ruling plaintiffs based complaints on hypothetical damages. The complaint was filed again Thursday, this time listing several "John Does” who reportedly were evicted from rental homes by landlords citing HB 1804.
•Hurdles for undocumented students
Undocumented immigrants still may pay in-state tuition at Oklahoma public colleges, but must meet higher standards, state regents decided. Students must have lived in Oklahoma for two years and have filed to legalize their immigration status. They previously only had to sign an affidavit that they intended to seek legal status. Regents adopted the rules to comply with HB 1804.
Related Topics:
U.S. State Government, U.S. Government, Culture and Lifestyle, Social Policy, Religion, Christianity, Immigration Policy, Civil Trials, Trials, Roman Catholicism, Immigration


Prev




Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
-- Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy on the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
2. The undocumented people hired by the US citizens also broke the law.
3. Why does this law only choose to punish those assisting one group of "law breakers"?
4. Those who are afraid the country may change seem to prefer focusing on half of the people who broke the law, but fail to hold the other half accountable.
5. The fears written in the paragraphs below mirror things written about any group of aliens that has ever entered the country: as a group they are more criminal than the rest of the country; they spawn and encourage illegal activity; their cultural difference is disturbing; the only way to manage them is to assure swift and severe consequences for unpermitted acts. These ideas are no more true for the current group than they were for the Germans, Italians, Irish, and other groups previously targeted.
6. Unless an author can cite a reliable source for the reported numbers, the numbers reported are merely opinions, not facts.
7. A meaningful lesson from the Bible charges Christians with the responsibility to stand up for the poor, the widowed, the orphaned, and the alien.
8. Civil disobedience has a long, honored history in our country - people who have stood up for their beliefs and were willing to go to jail for them have gained our national respect: Thoreau, Parks and King, to name a few.
9. Human beings have the ability to rationalize any behavior - and the ultimate evil results when we choose to look at evil and call it good.
10. Christ taught us to discern the value of the tree by looking at its fruit. The fruit of this law is: divided families; increased social intolerance; criminalization of compassion - punishing those who see a "human being" where others choose only to see a "criminal."
11. The magnificence of the first amendment is that anyone can say what they believe and still be an American - the framers of the Constitution believed unrestricted political dialog insured the nation's well-being.
12. Our nation learned during the Viet Nam War that our soldiers were hurt by the dishonor heaped on them by protesters who did not differentiate between the war they hated and the soldiers fighting in the war.
13. Although we learned that lesson, and all sides now make efforts to recognize the soldiers are patriots serving their country, some have reinterpreted the lesson to require nothing short of total agreement with their own "patriotic" ideal - but that is not an American ideal - that is an ideal of a dictatorship, a totalitarian regime, or fascist state.
14. To live up to our national heritage, we must value and respect each other's opinions.
15. Those of us who are Christian must also value and respect the teachings of our leader.
16. When the two conflict, the most patriotic thing to do is to point that out - by civil disobedience, if necessary.
17. The willingness to risk jail for important truths represents part of what made this nation great.
18. Failure to respect each other, unwillingness to enter into social dialog, choosing to resort to name calling, and refusal to try to see the other's side, all reflect the unpatriotic actions tearing this nation apart.
19. We can continue to protect the heritage we were given, or we can choose to let is slip away by belittling those who don't agree with us.
20. Ultimately, THAT fundamental choice decides the national legacy our children and grandchildren will receive.