Immigration battle heats up
Immigration battle heats up
Published: October 26, 2007
•Catholics vow to resist measure
Catholic Archbishop Eusebius J. Beltran and a council of priests with the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City have signed a pledge opposing the state's new immigration law. The "Pledge of Resistance” is to be presented to Gov. Brad Henry's office today, an archdiocese spokesman said. "We are making the statement that there is a higher law — a law of charity and helping your fellow man,” said the Rev. Michael Chapman.
NewsOK Related Articles
•Legal challenge revived in Tulsa
A second lawsuit has been filed challenging the immigration legislation in Tulsa federal court. U.S. District Judge James Payne had dismissed a lawsuit against state officials, ruling plaintiffs based complaints on hypothetical damages. The complaint was filed again Thursday, this time listing several "John Does” who reportedly were evicted from rental homes by landlords citing HB 1804.
•Hurdles for undocumented students
Undocumented immigrants still may pay in-state tuition at Oklahoma public colleges, but must meet higher standards, state regents decided. Students must have lived in Oklahoma for two years and have filed to legalize their immigration status. They previously only had to sign an affidavit that they intended to seek legal status. Regents adopted the rules to comply with HB 1804.
Related Topics:
U.S. State Government, U.S. Government, Culture and Lifestyle, Social Policy, Religion, Christianity, Immigration Policy, Civil Trials, Trials, Roman Catholicism, Immigration


Prev




Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
-- Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy on the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
2. The undocumented people hired by the US citizens also broke the law.
3. Why does this law only choose to punish those assisting one group of "law breakers"?
4. Those who are afraid the country may change seem to prefer focusing on half of the people who broke the law, but fail to hold the other half accountable.
5. The fears written in the paragraphs below mirror things written about any group of aliens that has ever entered the country: as a group they are more criminal than the rest of the country; they spawn and encourage illegal activity; their cultural difference is disturbing; the only way to manage them is to assure swift and severe consequences for unpermitted acts. These ideas are no more true for the current group than they were for the Germans, Italians, Irish, and other groups previously targeted.
6. Unless an author can cite a reliable source for the reported numbers, the numbers reported are merely opinions, not facts.
7. A meaningful lesson from the Bible charges Christians with the responsibility to stand up for the poor, the widowed, the orphaned, and the alien.
8. Civil disobedience has a long, honored history in our country - people who have stood up for their beliefs and were willing to go to jail for them have gained our national respect: Thoreau, Parks and King, to name a few.
9. Human beings have the ability to rationalize any behavior - and the ultimate evil results when we choose to look at evil and call it good.
10. Christ taught us to discern the value of the tree by looking at its fruit. The fruit of this law is: divided families; increased social intolerance; criminalization of compassion - punishing those who see a "human being" where others choose only to see a "criminal."
11. The magnificence of the first amendment is that anyone can say what they believe and still be an American - the framers of the Constitution believed unrestricted political dialog insured the nation's well-being.
12. Our nation learned during the Viet Nam War that our soldiers were hurt by the dishonor heaped on them by protesters who did not differentiate between the war they hated and the soldiers fighting in the war.
13. Although we learned that lesson, and all sides now make efforts to recognize the soldiers are patriots serving their country, some have reinterpreted the lesson to require nothing short of total agreement with their own "patriotic" ideal - but that is not an American ideal - that is an ideal of a dictatorship, a totalitarian regime, or fascist state.
14. To live up to our national heritage, we must value and respect each other's opinions.
15. Those of us who are Christian must also value and respect the teachings of our leader.
16. When the two conflict, the most patriotic thing to do is to point that out - by civil disobedience, if necessary.
17. The willingness to risk jail for important truths represents part of what made this nation great.
18. Failure to respect each other, unwillingness to enter into social dialog, choosing to resort to name calling, and refusal to try to see the other's side, all reflect the unpatriotic actions tearing this nation apart.
19. We can continue to protect the heritage we were given, or we can choose to let is slip away by belittling those who don't agree with us.
20. Ultimately, THAT fundamental choice decides the national legacy our children and grandchildren will receive.
"...intelligence reports indicate they are attempting to purchase uranium from africa". -- president george w. bush -- state of the union 2004
"look at the big brain on bret, you're a smart mother f%$*&er". -- samuel l. jackson pulp fiction 1994.
-- Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy on the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
but its not that simple, just like immigration. if you were offered a job for $1,000,000 per year and accepted it but it was in France would you first have to learn french even if it wasn't important for your job? and jan, last time i checked you hadn't made a decent point in all your postings on this blog. what if i told you i knew an undocumented immigrant that came here with his parents at the age of 9. he has a valid (oregon) driver's license, auto and health insurance that he pays for and has been gainfully employed for 6 years. he pays in $5600 per year in taxes and gets $0 back (even though if he were a citizen he'd be ebtitled to get 80% of it back). should he be subject to this? this is a REAL example. 100% accurate. what do you think you should do in this case?
I agree with Rufus but go even further. In my opinion, all religions should be taxed just like any other business. Many, and not just Catholic, churches expound information about voting and support of certain politicians from the pulpit. If they are concerned about laws and politics, they should be willing to pay taxes.
Perhaps, since these people are 'so willing to work hard for an existence', they should be arrested and used to mow, paint, clean, etc., public streets and buildings for room and board but without actual pay. How many would stay then?
Entering the country is illegal. If laws are unenforced, the law itself becomes impotent and anarchy becomes the law.
If one wants to talk about racism, explain the idea behind "La Raza" to me.
January 4, 2007 (Washington, DC) – After numerous refusals over three and a half years, the Social Security Administration (SSA) has released the first known public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement. The government made the disclosure in response to lawsuits filed under the Freedom of Information Act by TREA Senior Citizens League, a 1.2 million member nonpartisan seniors advocacy group.
The Totalization Agreement could allow millions of illegal Mexican workers to draw billions of dollars from the U.S. Social Security Trust Fund.
A loophole in current Social Security law could allow millions of today's Mexican workers to eventually collect billions of dollars worth of Social Security benefits for earnings under fraudulent or "non-work authorized" Social Security numbers, putting huge new pressures on the Social Security Trust Fund.
If an illegal worker working in the United States today gets a "work authorized" Social Security number through guest worker immigration legislation, the Totalization Agreement, or perhaps just over time, that worker could eventually apply for Social Security benefits once he or she has met eligibility requirements.
In addition, that worker could be able to claim credits for work performed while in the U.S. illegally. The SSA maintains an "earnings suspense file," which tracks wages that cannot be posted to individual workers' records because there is no match for a name and Social Security number. Once an immigrant gains access to a work authorized Social Security number – whether a legal citizen or not – wages earned while in the U.S. unlawfully could be reinstated to the worker's new Social Security account.
The Congressional Research Service reports the earnings suspense file currently stands at approximately $520 billion. According to the congressional testimony of SSA Inspector General Patrick P. O'Carroll in February 2006, "We believe the chief cause of wage items being posted to the earnings suspense file instead of an individual's earning record is unauthorized work by non citizens."
As for Dave's comment about the anger being directed more at illegal Mexicans, they are the only ones that are causing all of the problems. All this talk about them "LIVING IN THE SHADOWS" is a bunch of hogwash. Anyone that commits a crime and then marchs up and down the streets yelling about it can not be too afraid of anything.
I come for visit, get treated regal, so I stay, who care I illegal? I cross border, poor and broke, take bus, see employment folk. Nice man treat me good in there, say I need to see welfare. Welfare say, you come no more,we send cash right to your door. Welfare checks, they make you wealthy, Medicaid, it keep you healthy. By and by, I got plenty money, Thanks to you, American dummy. Write to frieds in Motherland, tell them to come, fast as you can. They come in rags and Chubby trucks, I buy big house with welfare bucks. They come here, we live together, more welfare checks, it get better. Fourteen families, they move in, but neighbor's patience wearing thin. Finally, white guy moves away, now I buy his house and then I say, find more aliens for house to rent, and in the front yard I put up a tent. Send for family,they just trash, but they too draw the welfare cash. Everything is much good and soon we own the neighborhood. We have habits, called breeding, welfare pay for baby feeding. Kid need dentist, wife need pill, we get free,we got no bills. American crazy, he pay all year to keep welfare running here. We think America darn good place, to darn good for the white man race. If they no like us they can go, got lots of room in Mexico.
You also made some good points. While I read ALL of the previous posts, I kept thinking that not all of the USA was taken from the Indians. You said it well when you posted "Now, as far as everyone saying that the Europeans took the land from the Indians there is one MAJOR difference between now and then. The land was largely inhabited and there was room and resources for new inhabitants and there weren't 3 million Europeans entering the U.S. every year as there are with illegal aliens." Thanks!
Mikki (from OKC) seems to have a solid head on her shoulders. "It's not Mexicans people hate, it's illegal activity". Spot on, Mikki. A few others of you also have very valid points, the rest are just ignorant ramblings and proof that some of you aren't grasping what the real topic of debate is.
This is America, EVERYBODY is welcome, all you have to do is follow the proper procedure (easier said than done, I know, but nothing in life is free), but whether you're black, brown, white, man, woman, or child, you're welcome here, that's the glory of America. Just do so legally, your efforts will be rewarded people. America has enough problems of its own, though. Too many legal US citizens are sick, homeless, dying, and hungry. To have a solid America, we need a solid foundation. Too much time, effort, and especially money is spent on illegal immigrants (deportation and border security (ALL borders) are the only fees I see fit) when that money could be better spent feeding our hungry children, in-school and after-school programs, medicines for those who can't afford what they NEED, food for hungry, etc... Completely closing the borders isn't a likely possibility, but things need to severely tighten down, and quick. Until we (US citizens of ANY race, religion, age, or sex) can clean up our home and rebuild our ground floors (getting people off the street, kids back in school, etc) then we might want to think about hanging the "Welcome" mat up for a while.
I'm not Kelly Ogle, but that's my two cents.
Mikki (from OKC) seems to have a solid head on her shoulders. "It's not Mexicans people hate, it's illegal activity". Spot on, Mikki. A few others of you also have very valid points, the rest are just ignorant ramblings and proof that some of you aren't grasping what the real topic of debate is.
This is America, EVERYBODY is welcome, all you have to do is follow the proper procedure (easier said than done, I know, but nothing in life is free), but whether you're black, brown, white, man, woman, or child, you're welcome here, that's the glory of America. Just do so legally, your efforts will be rewarded people. America has enough problems of its own, though. Too many legal US citizens are sick, homeless, dying, and hungry. To have a solid America, we need a solid foundation. Too much time, effort, and especially money is spent on illegal immigrants (deportation and border security (ALL borders) are the only fees I see fit) when that money could be better spent feeding our hungry children, in-school and after-school programs, medicines for those who can't afford what they NEED, food for hungry, etc... Completely closing the borders isn't a likely possibility, but things need to severely tighten down, and quick. Until we (US citizens of ANY race, religion, age, or sex) can clean up our home and rebuild our ground floors (getting people off the street, kids back in school, etc) then we might want to think about hanging the "Welcome" mat up for a while.
I'm not Kelly Ogle, but that's my two cents.
My friends are hard working people that came into the US with nothing, many years ago and have made something for themselves and their families.
The reason we have so many employers hiring illegals is because Mexicans are hard workers and will work from dawn to dusk to get a job done, for alot less money then their American counter part who will not do the job the Mexican will do anyway.
Illegals need to go back to Mexico and come back legally, American's need to get off welfare, realize they are not to good to do the job's Mexicans will do and go to work.
To the many people who use the welfare system because of actual necessity, you are not included in the above generalazation.
But, as a society, we dont want to align ourselves publicly with the reform laws beause we worry about backlash and ridicule. So I say this now. Do more than type your feeling on an anonymous board. Speak out with friends and those in our government and let them know that this isnt about racism. Its about stopping the growing costs and impact associated with illegal immigration.
Lets make the statement, if you want to come to this country, do it legally and love it as we do. You can still respect and love your country of origin and keep your traditions. BUT LEARN THE LANGUAGE, STOP BREAKING LAWS AND CONTRIBUTE AS AN AMERICAN. Do this and be welcome, fail to and your gone.
I agree with Ray who said "The only thing the Catholics are interested in is keeping all the donations they get from Hispanic families". They also prohibit birth control for this reason. More catholics + less education = more income for the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City.
There may be some who support criminals but there are far more who oppose them in OK.