Ford Center plan must be OK'd before Sonics vote
Ford Center plan must be OK'd before Sonics vote

Comments Comment on this article190

By Bryan Dean
Published: December 21, 2007

OKLAHOMA CITY voters will decide March 4 whether they want their city to be an NBA town.

Featured Video

Advertisement

The city will ask voters to approve a temporary 1-cent sales tax to pay for improvements at the Ford Center that would put the arena on par with the best NBA venues in the country, Mayor Mick Cornett said Thursday.

The vote will come a month before NBA owners decide whether to approve the Seattle SuperSonics' application to relocate to Oklahoma City.

Without a yes vote on the tax, the city likely won't get a team, Cornett said.

"No one is forcing us to do this,” Cornett said.

"This is a choice. We can choose to be an NBA city, or we can choose not to be. We're not going to get a franchise if we don't pass it.”

Like ‘a brand-new arena'
The city has contracted with the architect who built the Ford Center, The Benham Companies, to study what improvements will be needed to bring the arena to NBA standards.

A practice facility, better concession areas, new restaurants and other fan amenities are among the improvements expected to be included in the architect's report.

The improvements would be funded by a temporary sales tax to be collected beginning Jan. 1, 2009 — the day after the MAPS for Kids penny sales tax expires. Cornett said the tax would likely last one year to 15 months and pay for about $100 million worth of improvements. The Ford Center cost about $92 million to build.

The exact cost of the improvements and length of the tax will be announced by Jan. 2, the day the city council is scheduled to vote to set the March 4 election.

Cornett said the city, working in consultation with the NBA, has determined a new arena won't be needed in the near future. The renovations would make the Ford Center comparable to the league's best arenas and will prevent the city from needing a new arena for at least 10 to 15 years.

"For all intents and purposes, it will be a brand-new arena the day it opens,” Cornett said.

Clay Bennett, the Oklahoma City businessman who leads the SuperSonics' ownership group, gave a preliminary endorsement to the move Thursday.

"Mayor Cornett and the city have taken a visionary and appropriate step towards becoming an NBA city,” Bennett said. "I applaud their leadership.”

Vote would be timely
City officials considered including Ford Center improvements in a MAPS 3 initiative expected to go to a vote late next year, but Cornett said it can't wait.

The NBA Board of Governors, made up of representatives from each ownership group in the league, is scheduled to vote on the SuperSonics relocation request in April. Cornett said the improvements must be approved before then to convince the league Oklahoma City is committed to hosting an NBA franchise permanently.

"We don't feel like a MAPS 3 initiative is ready to go in its entirety,” Cornett said. "The only prudent thing to do was pull the Ford Center improvements out and have it voted upon by itself.”

Even if the league approves the relocation request, the team moving isn't a sure thing.

The SuperSonics are in a legal battle with the city of Seattle over the terms of its lease, with the city claiming the team must play its games in Seattle until the current lease expires in 2010.

If legal disputes keep the Sonics from moving to Oklahoma City, the Ford Center improvements will be re-worked or delayed, Cornett said.

"We're not going to build something we don't need,” Cornett said.

Unlike past ballot initiatives like MAPS for Kids, city officials expect organized and well-funded opposition to the Ford Center proposal.

Cornett said the city will rely on the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce to get its message to the voters.

Brett Hamm, president of Downtown Oklahoma City Inc., said the chamber and the downtown business community will be big supporters of the proposal.

"With the Hornets, we saw a total economic impact between $65 and $70 million during their two-year stay,” Hamm said. "Regardless of whether you're an NBA fan or sports fan at all, having our own major league team in Oklahoma City expands business growth, development and opportunity across the city.”

Cornett said he knows getting the proposal passed will be a fight, but it's one he believes city leaders can win.

"My perception is that this city has loved the NBA's presence and wants more of it and is willing to invest in itself,” Cornett said.


 


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford

Junkmycar.com
Read this Towing & Wrecking Service's reviews & find Auto Info.
Oklahomacity.Citysearch.com

Sarah Palin's IQ is 113
Think You're Really Smarter than Sarah? Take the IQ to Find Out Now.
challengeiq.com

shareView All

Buzz Up!


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Right on Glenn! There are bigger issues down the road. The rail infrastructure does need to be fixed before it is too late. Oklahoma City has little if any mixed-use zoning; which translates into long drives no matter where you have to go from home. I think pro basketball is great and Oklahoma City can embrace it. But, let Mr. Bennett and Mr McClendon pay for the Ford Center. They could call it the BenClendon Center. I am sure Ford would love to sell the naming rights away right now anyway; they are in financial straights still. A penny here and a penny there then after a while, like the old saying goes, it starts be a lot of money.

Let the NBA come here; awesome idea. The real bad precedent that was set back along time ago where cities funded private business should not continue. I am ready for BenClendon Center.
Benny, Oklahoma City - Feb 21, 2008 at 12:00 pm
When Central Oklahomans' power was recently out for days following a mere ice storm, they didn't need "basketball." They needed heat and light. All the "basketball" in the world wouldn't have helped them. Those "all electric" households without gas as a back up have now hopefully re-learned what most pioneers knew over 100 years ago: Never put all your eggs into one basket. There are a number of things Central Oklahoma needs a lot worse than "basketball." It needs to save its imminently threatened rail center and railway infrastructure (threatened by the "basketball pushers") for conversion to modern transit -- as a backup to "highways-only." If the oil supply goes down, it will be just as down as the electricity was -- and there'll be a lot of Oklahomans kicking themselves for spending their hard-won dollars on needless extravagance instead of getting down to the business of providing needed basic services for the working citizens. We need serious public transit. We're unacceptably vulnerable without it. If the big shots want "basketball," let 'em pay for it. They can have it with their "cake." If it's really the great "economic boon" and "tremendous business investment" they claim, why would they hesitate?
Glenn, Moore - Dec 31, 2007 at 2:28 am
Larry if you're angry now - wait until the Mayor and his crew allow the Sonics to write their own lease terms to use the Ford Center.
Ted, Seattle - Dec 27, 2007 at 10:39 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Ted
"...it will cost about $100 million to bring the Ford Center to NBA standards." This is a LIE. We were told when MAPS was being pushed that the Arena was designed and to be built to meet NBA/NHL standards. Of course specific completions would be made by the tenant (paint color, carpeting choices, floor plans etc). Then when the Hornets relocated here for 2 seasons (if I remember correctly), a million dollars of upgrades were done (NBA floor, scoreboards, locker room improvements etc.) The very idea that we need to spend $100 to $150 million MORE to make it NBA worthy is absurd. Either this is a lie or what we were told to sell MAPS was a lie (maybe both). Since his re-election, the Mayor has become just another tax-and-spend politician. I am ashamed to have voted for him twice. The Mayor has said it will be like a brand new facility when finished. It should, the Ford Center is ONLY 5 years old! When are the lies, half-truths and spin going to stop? We can spend another $150 million without raising taxes (another LIE - extending a "temporary" tax is the same as raising it folks) just like the $800 million bond issue that just passed 2 weeks ago (another LIE, you can't spend that much money without it affecting taxes). I have the same problem with this tax proposal as I did with the school bond issue not too long ago. Most of what was proposed had already been paid for with Maps for Kids (according to the Maps for Kids literature that is mailed periodically). Just as tax payers were asked to pay for something they had already paid for, we are asked to pay for the Ford Center again (already paid $90 million, more-or-less).
Larry, Oklahoma City - Dec 27, 2007 at 4:49 am
The design of the Ford Center was excellent in that it was built to the most up-to-date standards for the NBA and NHL in dimensions but bare bones. It was what we could afford at the time and it gave us the ability to upgrade it if we were able to attract a team. The remodel will require very little demo and will be almost exclusively value added.

The final cost in on what Mayor Cornett, working in conjuction with the NBA, has said will put the Ford Center among the top tier arenas in the NBA, will be less than 200 million dollars. Thats insane.

Compare that with the cost of new arenas in places like Tulsa, Wichita and Louisville where they have no chance of landing a major league team and yet want a nice arena and the entertainment value they provide for their communitys.

Downtown OKC was in a pretty bad place in the early 90's and through some truly visionary leadership, we made the chose to invest a penny sales tax in ourselves. The results have been remarkable. We invested 350 million dollars that were aimed primarly at OKC's dying downtown and intercity and that has resulted in a renaissance of our intercity. Our 350 million has returned well over a billion dollars in private investment.

Getting an NBA team is just a big fat benefit of what we're doing as a city, as this arena upgrade would have been part of MAPS 3 regardless of whether we got an NBA team or not. We're just moving this project up to the front because of the opportunity before us.
Bug, Tulsa - Dec 26, 2007 at 1:31 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bug
So what you're saying Roger is that you talk out your backside, you make statements about things when you actually have no clue of what they really are.
Ted, Seattle - Dec 24, 2007 at 1:37 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Ted
"Well ROG, sounds more like a statement of fairness than one of vendictiveness"...Well T the text sounds reasonable but the timing of it makes it lean towards vindictive...We all know why it was passed...It will be long gone before your two more popular teams come back to the trough
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 23, 2007 at 6:02 pm
"Society has become overly sports centric. City residents define a city, not a sports team. A sports team cannot generate population, industry, or progressive business opportunities beyond the service industries meant to support the sports business(es)."...They may not Evan but landing a major league team does give us another escape from all the stress and crap surrounding of our lives...That aspect alone makes this a no brainer in my book
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 23, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Becoming a “Major League City” requires a lot more than attracting a “Major League” sports team. It requires spirit, visionary leadership, social sensitivity, education, population, and the infrastructure to support a vibrant industry/business climate. I don’t like the term “Major League City” because of its connotation toward Major League sports. I prefer the term Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) based upon population.

What Oklahoma City metro area residents see in other cities such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and Dallas (the top four ranking Metropolitan Statistical Areas) is in most cases a mis-representation of their community spirit. The owners and players are atypical of area residents, not just because of their pay but because of how they have achieved their chosen professions. They in and of themselves are a part of the entertainment business. The only example of a sports team defining a community would be the Green Bay Packers, which unless I am mistaken, is not owned by a single individual but by individual shares spread out through the community. At least that was the way that they were founded.

When has a sports team really defined a community? Why do Oklahomans want to fall into that trap? Society has become overly sports centric. City residents define a city, not a sports team. A sports team cannot generate population, industry, or progressive business opportunities beyond the service industries meant to support the sports business(es). As Richard mentioned Rome had its Bread and Circuses. Do we in “conservative” Oklahoma want to head in a similar direction because we see from afar what we believe sports has brought to other communities? The perception might be different than reality. Do we want that climate in the metro Oklahoma City area? I guess Oklahoma City voters will decide for the greater Oklahoma City Metro area.

Oklahoma City is the number 45 MSA in the nation. Desiring to be number one is a trap. Envy is the reason why University of Oklahoma Fans have been disappointed in all but 8 or 9 years over the past 100 or so years of playing college football. Being a Norman resident I can say that this community and university are defined by much more than the OU football team. Life is not just about sports. I would hope that Oklahoma City residents would think about Oklahoma City and its direction in their collective votes and less about attracting a major league sports team. Norman and the University of Oklahoma are not going to close-the-doors, even if the university shuts down the football program. The converse may be true if we become so obsessed with sports to the point of neglecting higher education and city services. Fortunately I can say that there are enough people here who believe in Norman to make certain that Bob Stoops salary will not close down the city or University.

Maybe Oklahoma City should take the approach of Green Bay, take up a collection, and start a sports franchise using their own pennies. Now that is a spirit that could define Oklahoma City. Is there really a need for Clay Bennett to even be involved? Come on Oklahoma City... if major league sports can truly define your city, why don't you buy the team rather than build another new arena for a billionaire who will break your hearts five years from now when the renovated Ford Center is not adequate?
Evan, Norman - Dec 23, 2007 at 4:57 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Evan
All this arena does is put money into the pockets of Ed Gaylord's daughter. Her husband, Clay Bennett, is part owner of the Sonics. Oh, and Christ Everest, her sister, owns this newspaper that published this story. A vote to upgrade is to put tax money in their pockets.
stinkerpants, Oklahoma City - Dec 23, 2007 at 12:06 pm
"vindictive I-91" ROGER, MOORE - Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM ... Let's see. Here's the text of I-91: The measure requires that for-profit professional sports organizations pay the City at least "fair value" for goods, services, real property, or facilities the City provides or leases to them. The measure defines "fair value," as the rate of return for 30-year U.S. Treasury Bonds. ... Well ROG, sounds more like a statement of fairness than one of vendictiveness.
Ted, Seattle - Dec 23, 2007 at 9:34 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Ted
Glenn, you can't speak to these people. They're like amoebas. "Any of various one-celled aquatic or parasitic protozoans of the genus Amoeba or related genera, having no definite form and consisting of a mass of protoplasm containing one or more nuclei surrounded by a flexible outer membrane. It moves by means of pseudopods." Their single mind cells only thinks of sports and they use parasitic means to achieve their goals like pass taxes instead of increasing ticket prices like a free economy should do. They flex according to their emotions about sports. That is why OKC will always remain 45th per capita income.
Richard, Oklahoma City - Dec 23, 2007 at 7:41 am
Pro basketball doesn't get anybody to work in the morning or home in the afternoon. Oklahoma City needs a decent transportation system. If worldwide oil supply stops tomorrow, Oklahoma City stops soon thereafter (comprende?). That's a clear threat to major employers and military installations. Such obvious, overriding vulnerability would be urgently unacceptable to any real leader. Thanks to the brilliant and responsible 5th District voters who kept returning Ernie Istook to congress for 14 years, Salt Lake City and Tinker's competitor, Hill AFB, are benefiting from a rapidly developing fast, efficient and safe rail transit network -- partly funded with Oklahoma-derived transit dollars. Phoenix is following suit. How dependent on pro basketball is Salt Lake? Sacramento? Portland? Phoenix? Each is well along in world-class transportation development for their labor force and visitors. Nothing means more to quality of life, to the basic economy, security, fundamental stability and real economic development than reliable, low-cost, strategically redundant transportation. Nothing means more to transit development than existing urban rail facilities. OKC's are the best in the West. Why is it that those who are behind "pro basketball" in OKC are also the same folks determined to destroy the center of our phenomenal regional rail assets? Why is our truly highly qualified City Planning chief leaving at a time like this? Oklahomans would do well to get their heads out of the superficial pop-culture whirl long enough to do a little reading between the lines. Just keep repeating to yourself, "45th in per capita income..."
Glenn, Moore - Dec 23, 2007 at 12:45 am
OKC needs a professional basketball team. The Supersonics are way more marketable than the Hornets. They can bring a lot of new money to the city.
Andrew, Oklahoma City - Dec 23, 2007 at 12:11 am
Saturday, 12-22-07 OKLAHOMAN
CITY PLANNER HAS NEW PLANS

Oklahoma City's planning director, John Dugan, has resigned to take another job.

Dugan, who has worked in the position for the past seven years, will leave Jan. 31 to become deputy planning director for the city of Los Angeles.

He announced his decision this week.

Dugan, 60, said he took the position because it offers retirement benefits he is not eligible for in Oklahoma City.

In an e-mail to city employees, Dugan said he was proud to be a part of the successful resurgence of downtown Oklahoma City. He also said he plans to come back.

"Oklahoma City will always be my home," Dugan said. "I plan to retire back here in 10 years, but I will certainly be visiting often."
Glenn, Moore - Dec 22, 2007 at 11:42 pm
Wow, Ted fits the description of the typical Seattle resident perfectly. Pomous, arrogant, condescending and rude. Things that don't often describe Oklahomans. To be a resident of a city that's over a billion dollars in debt that's financed long term and will be over 2 billion dollars before It's paid for on sports facilitys and lecture us on whether or not we should spend 100 million on our arena to make it " among the top tier arenas in the NBA" is pretty goofy. Talk about zero credability....But then again Ted is who he is, Debbie Downer. If he were calling the shots and did what he's lectured us about, Seattle would no longer have major league sports.
Bug, Tulsa - Dec 22, 2007 at 10:44 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bug
"If the Sonics were interested in good faith negotiations, the city would respond. But, they're not."...Good faith negotiations like passing a vindictive I-91?
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 22, 2007 at 7:46 pm
Jill ... oh Jill, Jill, Jill - I'm not trying to protect anyone from anything. I'm simply posting factual economic data. What you do with it is your choice. It's impossible to take anything you say seriously anyway - just yesterday you were posting on and on about how "the arena improvements dont make a penny more for ownership". So it's clear to everyone that you're not very astute. Which is fine - you don't have to pass an IQ test to vote. .... Further, I don't oppose the arena upgrades at OKC. What I've done is post the economic realities of subsidizing an NBA franchise. If you prefer to have a team despite the economic short comings that go with it - I'm not here to tell you that is incorrect. However, when you post nonsense about how this "will be a huge economic benefit for the city" I'll correct it - because it's simply not true. You can look it up. It's not even debatable at this point. Of course I don't want the Sonics to leave Seattle, but that doesnt make me the village idiot who would hand over untold millions to keep them. If the Sonics were interested in good faith negotiations, the city would respond. But, they're not. Their interested in getting the maximum public subsidy while providing the minimum return - that's where you come in Jill.
Ted, Seattle - Dec 22, 2007 at 4:31 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Ted
Ah, but we know that our arena needs upgrading, and the price tag is reasonable. Ted, if it were the Hornets thinking about moving here, you'd happily be lambasting PJ or Sam on a Sonics message board, and wouldn't be trying to protect lil ole Oklahoma City from that carpetbagging Clay. Let's be honest and say you don't want the Sonics to move to Oklahoma City, and that's the reason for your opposition to arena ugrades here. Guess what. I don't either. I'd rather see the Hornets here, because moving a team out of New Orleans is better for the NBA than moving one out of Seattle. David Stern didn't ask me what I'd like, however, and the bottom line is that I want Oklahoma City to get an NBA team. I wanted an expansion team the most, but Clay's been asking Stern for one of those for years, without any success. He didn't buy the Sonics until Stern said no to expansion and to the Hornets staying here. So, blame Stern and let us decide what to do with our arena. I'm not telling you how to vote in Washington, although I think you'd be a fool not to vote for a new arena if it comes up for a vote in Seattle. I guess you'd vote no to either a Key upgrade or a new arena, though, since you don't think we should do it here.
Jill, www.okcthunderfans.com - Dec 22, 2007 at 1:58 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jill
"That is why so many people don't want to fund a new arena because that don't want to make your boy richer"...Or you could just say the other two sports are much more popular...Already paid $100 mil more than what the team was actually worth...Pretty sure that pocket book opens very easily
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 22, 2007 at 12:06 pm
Roger, the Owners of the Mariners and Seahawks made much larger contributions to their new Stadiums than your boy Bennett is willing to do. That is the issue at hand. That is why so many people don't want to fund a new arena because that don't want to make your boy richer. He needs to open his pocket book more if he is such a serious player!!
Sonics Man, Seattle - Dec 22, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Roger, you silly goose. The Kingdome was literally falling down - as in the roof was colapsing - the Key Arena is perfectly fine. Well, not fine for the greedy NBA and their lust for 100% monopoly of revenues... so your comparision is not accurate. Toodles Rogey.
Ted, Seattle - Dec 22, 2007 at 11:58 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Ted
"David Stern has wondered why there's so much opposition to a taxpayer-funded arena."...I think Stern is more concerned about why there was less opposition to the Hawks and Mariners taxpayer funded stadiums
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 22, 2007 at 10:59 am
""When did Americans decide to quit the business of being citizens and become mere "consumers," perpetually in need of an entertainment "fix?" Oklahoma needs "an economy" a lot worse than it needs a professional sports franchise""....I work hard and enjoy attending sports events so yeah I am in need of an entertainment fix...Didn't see the part where you couldn't have an economy and a sports team Glenn...Long list of cities that have both...Time to add OKC to that list
ROGER, MOORE - Dec 22, 2007 at 10:37 am
When did Americans decide to quit the business of being citizens and become mere "consumers," perpetually in need of an entertainment "fix?" Oklahoma needs "an economy" a lot worse than it needs a professional sports franchise. That bunch from New Orleans came and went -- and Oklahoma is still 45th in per capita income and fading, with an easily stampeded, casino-overloaded, fad-sodden bunch of "consumers" chanting the sort of incredibly silly, stunningly ill-informed nonsense we've now read on this forum. Don't you think the big shots behind this basketball rah rah know what it takes to keep the poor residents of poor old Oklahoma right where they want them? If they want basketball, let them pay for it. Better yet -- get right to the heart of the matter and let's have one more rendition Cheech and Chong's all-too-trenchant classic, "Basketball Jones," as what it's really all about (lookit me -- I can dribble wid my eyebrows...). Snap out of it, Oklahoma. Read a little Sam Adams. Try to get up on your hind legs and act like worthy heirs of the American Revolution who aren't sitting round "waiting to be entertained."
Glenn, Moore - Dec 22, 2007 at 2:00 am

News Photo Galleriesview all