Public money is status quo for pro teams
Public money is status quo for pro teams

Comments Comment on this article18

By John Estus
Published: December 31, 2007

If you fund it, they will come.

That's the tune cities have heard for years from professional sports franchises looking for a new place to be the hometown team.

Advertisement

The City Council is expected to set a March election asking Oklahoma City voters to approve an extension of an existing one-cent sales tax that would last 15 months and raise $121 million for Ford Center improvements intended to help lure the Seattle SuperSonics.

And while governments nationwide are getting increasingly creative with the lucrative incentive packages offered as bait to lure the pro teams, Oklahoma City's upcoming NBA tax proposal is relatively straightforward, said Darren Rovell, a longtime sports business reporter now working for CNBC.

Rovell said it's not always a guarantee for voters to decide whether governments should spend public money on pro sports stadiums.

"That's really a step the public and the people should be happy about. The power is in their hands,” Rovell said. "In a lot of places, they would be able to railroad it through without having some sort referendum where the public actually would get to vote.”

Avoiding a public vote often happens in cities where opposition is expected, he said.

"The way these things have worked in the past with some cities has been beyond sketchy,” Rovell said.

Other financing methods used for arena construction or improvements include corporate sponsorships and the sale of personal seat licenses. Still, local governments often front the initial bill, which means the cities often own the buildings.

Oklahoma City owns the Ford Center, which is operated by SMG.

"As a city, we want an arena that is comparable to arenas in Charlotte and Memphis and Kansas City and Tulsa,” Mayor Mick Cornett said. "This arena will be on par or better than all these arenas that are opening across the country.”

To tax or not to tax?
Critics of publicly funded pro sports arenas say it is improper for governments to tax citizens who aren't interested in professional sports. They argue the teams and ticket holders should be the ones who are taxed.

Supporters of public dollars being spent to support pro sports teams tout both tangible and intangible benefits of the philosophy.

Measurable impacts include things that help cities' tax bases grow, such as economic gains and the creation of jobs.

Although it's not measurable with a concrete dollar figure, those who favor giving tax dollars to teams argue the boost pro sports can give to a city's image will benefit all citizens, even those who have no interest in supporting the teams.

"But the critics say that the buzz about how much more of a city it makes your city is garbage, and the only reason why the proponents put out these intangible statements like this is because they have to find some way to fill up the gap where the math doesn't make sense,” Rovell said.

The arguments are often as heated as on-the-field rivalries.

Here's a look at two recent instances of public funding of professional sports stadiums as reported in local and national news publications.

Hard bargain in Dallas
A predicament similar to the one the Sonics ownership group faced in its hunt for a new publicly-funded arena in the Seattle area played out south of the Red River a few years ago.

When Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones started hunting for a spot to build a new Cowboys stadium, cities from across the Dallas metroplex began offering the team incentives to lure the stadium within their city limits. The Cowboys now play at Texas Stadium in Irving.

Not surprisingly, the team's top demand was public money — and plenty of it. A number of different stadium sites and funding plans were discussed with area cities, but only one met the team's demands and put the issue before voters.

It was officials in the 367,000-person suburb of Arlington who agreed in 2004 to ask voters to approve raising multiple taxes to pay for part of the stadium's construction. Voters approved the proposal, and half of the stadium's $650 million construction cost is being paid by Arlington tax dollars.

Like the Oklahoma City voters who face a fast-approaching March election for the Ford Center upgrades, Arlington voters also watched their stadium proposal unfold quickly. City officials began negotiating with the Cowboys in the summer of 2004 and the tax hike proposal was put on a November ballot.

The state-of-the-art stadium is now under construction near the Texas Rangers' baseball stadium and opens in 2009.

The Arlington vote occurred after negotiations broke down with the city the team is named after: bigger, wealthier and more prestigious Dallas.

Former Dallas Mayor Laura Miller and the team both wanted the new stadium in Dallas' Fair Park, home of the Cotton Bowl. But the Cowboys wanted more money than Miller was willing to commit, so the football team started negotiations with Arlington.

Some in Dallas call Miller the mayor who lost the Dallas Cowboys to Arlington, but others praise her for dodging a deal that was perceived as unfair to taxpayers. The Cowboys had sought more than $400 million from Dallas voters, opposed to the $325 million Arlington officials were able to negotiate.

Despite losing the bid to have the stadium in Dallas, Miller and other Dallas officials helped Arlington leaders and team ownership successfully pitch the new Cowboys stadium as the site of 2011 Super Bowl.

Arena crucial for NBA
The last city a NBA team permanently relocated to was Memphis, Tenn.

The owner of the Grizzlies opted to move the team out of Vancouver in 2000 and about half a dozen cities were in the running to land the team. Most had a pro-level arena ready or in the works.

Memphis didn't.

What it had was the downtown Pyramid Arena, built in 1991. Officials concluded the Pyramid would've required a complete overhaul to meet NBA standards and decided to propose a new, publicly funded arena to improve Memphis' chances of wooing the Grizzlies.

Although the circumstances surrounding the Grizzlies' move and the arena's construction were a bit different, the question as to whether a publicly funded arena should be used as bait to lure the team was similar to the discussion Oklahoma City faces.

There was one big difference: Memphis voters were never asked to decide whether the spending was appropriate.

Tennessee's tax and bond laws didn't require a vote because officials decided to use revenue bonds instead of property or sales tax money to pay for the arena's construction.

A grassroots petition drive to force an election on the issue failed, and the $250 million FedEx Forum opened in 2004. The revenue bonds are being repaid through a fee on each ticket to events at the arena.


 


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford

Oklahoma City Jobs
$30/Hour Work From Home Jobs.View Home Jobs Now! Computer Required.
National-News-Gazette.com

Apartments in Oklahoma City
Apartment Listings in Oklahoma City. Floorplans, Amenities & Pricing.
Apartments.com/OklahomaCity

shareView All

Buzz Up!


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Jill wrote: “What kind of expansion are we talking about? The only thing I’ve seen mentioned that might be considered expansion is the skyboxes. The seating capacity will remain approximately the same. So, the improvements to the Ford Center are primarily for the benefit of the people attending the games, concerts and other events, not the owners of the theoretical NBA team. “
_________________________________________________________________
I didn’t see this either as it is only found in the PowerPoint presentation on the Chamber’s website. The team locker rooms, offices etc are part of the “expansion” of the Ford (as opposed to just reconfiguring current floor space). You are correct, they really aren’t doing much to change the actual arena for the common ticket holder and in fact are decreasing seating by about 300 (which drops us from #14 to #21 is seating capacity). But your conclusion that the improvements are primarily for the people is incorrect. With the “Sole Master Tenant” lease the owners will be pushing very hard for, the team gets all of the revenue from all the events, consessions etc (not just during the NBA games). This is money that used to go to the City. This is why Stern called the Key Lease the worst in the NBA. The NBA doesn’t like having to share.
Larry, Oklahoma City - Feb 14, 2008 at 11:37 pm
JILL: It has been reported on more than one occasion that the City will be paying for the teams relocation costs (among other things). The re-location hasn’t happened yet but the (tax payer) money is already being spent.
Larry, Oklahoma City - Jan 4, 2008 at 1:23 am
Mea Culpa - I just remember seeing a story on TV or the newspaper saying OKC's tax rate was the lowest city tax rate in the metro & when I googled Warr Acres sales tax, the first article that appeared was from Channel 5 confirming that info. When I googled Oklahoma sales tax cities, I got an article from About .com which confirmed several cities in the metro indeed had slightly lower tax rates than OKC. Please remember that Warr Acres sales tax increases by 1 cent & becomes effective on April 1st, bringing their sales tax rate to 4% which is higher than OKC's. --- http://okc.about.com/library/bloksalestax.htm ---
--- http://www.tax.ok.gov/newrates.html ---
John, Oklahoma City - Jan 1, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
Here are some local sales tax rates, from the OTC website:
Bethany 4%
Del City 3.5%
Edmond 3.25%
El Reno 3.75%
Forest Park 3%
Midwest City 3.3%
Moore 3.5%
Nichols Hills 4%
Norman 3%
Oklahoma City 3.875%
Shawnee 3%
Warr Acres 3%
Yukon 4%
Walter, Edmond - Jan 1, 2008 at 9:52 am
So shop and eat in Norman, S. Then you don't have to spend a penny to support Oklahoma City. Of course, perhaps you should avoid going to any events at the Ford Center as well, since you don't want to subsidize anyone. I couldn't come up with the $350 million to buy the team myself, nor could I afford the $30 million dollar relocation fee, or the rebranding costs if the Sonics' owners choose to change the name. So, I'm pretty grateful that someone else has bought the team for us, and will shoulder the costs of moving the team so that I can enjoy the NBA. Watching it on television is not the same, and my husband, who was not a basketball fan at all before 2005, is already bemoaning the lack of Hornets' basketball. They were a great entertainment value, and I loved spending those evenings with my family.
Jill, www.okcthunderfans.com - Dec 31, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jill
To S, Norman: According to channel 5's web site, Oklahoma City has the lowest sales tax rate of all the suburbs in the OKC metro area --- http://www.koco.com/news/14594412/detail.html ---
Also, according to a CNN/Money survey, 58% of the largest US cities have a combination state and local tax that is higher than Oklahoma City --- http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/taxesbycity2005/index.html --- We hope that as many of you as possible will shop in OKC to save on your taxes and help prepay for our improved Ford Center, if we voters agree to pass this extension of MAPS. God bless all in the NEW YEAR. -- John Hite
John, Oklahoma City - Dec 31, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
Did not the city of Norman do tax incentives for the huge new shopping and hotel convention center in norman. would that not be subsidizing big business to come to town. Cities do it everyday, and the people of OKC have realized the difference it has made, the events that are being drawn here, the notoriety we are obtaining. Not just the citizens of OKC will pay but all citizens but when you look at the numbers in a decade you might pay $25 for that penney extension. So beyond that why would you object to something that is going to bring more to OKC metro area besides the NBA. It will bring the quality of life to a point that corporations that are looking to relocate, or corporations looking to add heads will be more inclined to because of the quality of life is so high because we stood up as a city and said yes we are going to make this a better place for everyone to live and visit. OKC will bring more money in the city from the games and the events that will come to the NEW FORD CENTER.
Michael, Yukon - Dec 31, 2007 at 4:12 pm
And the status quo is bogus and needs to change. I really hope this thing fails. Why should taxpayers be punished to bring in a private enterprise. I thought the U.S. operated under the free-market system.
No more spending money in OKC I guess.
If they want to move to Kansas City, let them go. I love the NBA games but not enough for me to subsidize their presence here.
OKC is becoming an expensive place to live and do other things.
S, Norman - Dec 31, 2007 at 3:05 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore S
And the status quo is bogus and needs to change. I really hope this thing fails. Why should taxpayers be punished to bring in a private enterprise. I thought the U.S. operated under the free-market system.
No more spending money in OKC I guess.
If they want to move to Kansas City, let them go. I love the NBA games but not enough for me to subsidize their presence here.
OKC is becoming an expensive place to live and do other things.
S, Norman - Dec 31, 2007 at 2:59 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore S
Jill and John, it is to bad that these nay-sayers miss the point on the advantages besides having the NBA in town will bring. let alone for the new jobs it will create down town in the head quarters for the Sonics, to the jobs it will create permanently at the ford center, practice facilities let alone the additional wait staff bartenders and money flowing into down town area as well as the homes to be purchased. What they forget is that OKC no longer wants to live in the dust bowl image of a city that has no initiative to become a world class city. I am just glad that others like us can see the real benefits that this will bring the city year over year when the sonics are Jill and John, it is to bad that these nay-sayers miss the point on the advantages besides having the NBA in town will bring. let alone for the new jobs it will create down town in the head quarters for the Sonics, to the jobs it will create permanently we they moved here. This is a great city that is on the edge of a total renaissance and we are just on the cusp of fully changing the dust bowl dead city image to that of one that can compete on the world stage.
Michael, Yukon - Dec 31, 2007 at 1:55 pm
To mister, bogata, and Richard, Oklahoma City: I've never met any OKC civic leaders nor any Sonics investors, and I judge every public issue by its merits. I KNOW our prepaid arena and the rest of our MAPS assets have enhanced the lives of nearly every citizen. Without MAPS we would not have had all the wonderful concerts in the Ford Center, Billy Graham probably wouldn't have been able to preach here, the Hornets could never have relocated here temporarily, and our children and grandchildren would have been educated in substandard, old, and technology deficient schools. We have a chance to likely bring an NBA team here within the next 3 years. The fringe benefits of an NBA team far surpass the costs to upgrade our prepaid Ford Center. Our city leaders, in my opinion, are no lackeys for the Sonics investors, but just want to create the best Oklahoma City possible for our residents. LET'S GO FOR OKC PROGRESS! --- John M Hite
John, Oklahoma City - Dec 31, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
Even rhymes with shill.....
mister, bogata - Dec 31, 2007 at 12:08 pm
What kind of expansion are we talking about? The only thing I've seen mentioned that might be considered expansion is the skyboxes. The seating capacity will remain approximately the same. So, the improvements to the Ford Center are primarily for the benefit of the people attending the games, concerts and other events, not the owners of the theoretical NBA team. As an NBA arena, with it's substandard interior, the Ford Center would be an embarrassment to the owners, I'm sure. But, as a fan of other events as well, it's an embarrassment to me to hear out of town visitors snicker at the subpar bathrooms, flooring, scoreboard, etc. Since the Ford currently compares so poorly to the new Sprint Center in Kansas City, there's a chance we might eventually lose the Big Twelve Tournament, which is a huge money maker for the city. I'm quite sure OKC is the owner of the Ford Center and so, yes, they are planning to use "their own money" to improve the arena. As a "shill and lackey", as I seen to have been called, I'm in favor of the arena upgrades not only because I think an NBA team would be great fun for the city, and a great improvement to how OKC is perceived (maybe we could finally put the "dust bowl" perception to rest), but because it would improve the experience of people attending the Ford Center for many different kinds of events. Since I am a taxpayer here,unlike some of the other contributors to this discussion, I'm voting yes.
Jill, www.okcthunderfans.com - Dec 31, 2007 at 11:44 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jill
"How 'bout them Arlington Cowboys!"
K.L., warr acres - Dec 31, 2007 at 9:53 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore K.L.
Big money Dallas knew it was a sucker bet and is letting poor little Arlington carry the load , way to go Big D !
mister, bogata - Dec 31, 2007 at 7:36 am
It's ironic that so much " big " money in Oklahoma is oil money, and that that industry is the first one in line to scream about government intrusion when it befits them.But look at the hypocrisy here. They care about nothing but lining their own pockets. All their shills and lackeys will line up on this forum now and go on about how they have " helped" Oklahoma(City )with their philanthropy and donations, but any halfway intelligent person knows those donations net them a LOT more in write-offs then the actual out of pocket expenses. Mick Cornett is nothing but a boot-licker for his moneyed masters. This stuff disgusts me.
mister, bogata - Dec 31, 2007 at 7:34 am
It's ironic that so much " big " money in Oklahoma is oil money, and that that industry is the first one in line to scream about government intrusion when it befits them.But look at the hypocrisy here. They care about nothing but lining their own pockets. All their shills and lackeys will line up on this forum now and go on about how they have " helped" Oklahoma(City )with their philanthropy and donations, but any halfway intelligent person knows those donations net them a LOT more in write-offs then the actual out of pocket expenses. Mick Cornett is nothing but a boot-licker for his moneyed masters. This stuff disgusts me.
mister, bogata - Dec 31, 2007 at 7:34 am
Wow, sports events have become socialistic. Corporate welfare. America has died many years ago and people want their bread and circuses at taxpayers expense. The Ford Center owners can use their own money to expand instead of being leaches and using public money.
Richard, Oklahoma City - Dec 31, 2007 at 7:22 am

    News Photo Galleriesview all