Cole calls proposed gaming rule changes 'highly unjust'
Cole: Proposed gaming rule changes 'highly unjust'

Comments Comment on this article9

By Tony Thornton
Published: February 20, 2008

MIAMI, OK — Proposed restrictions on certain forms of American Indian gambling are "not only destructive, but highly unjust," U.S. Rep. Tom Cole said today.

Advertisement

During a congressional field hearing on the issue, Cole, R-Moore, said rules proposed to clarify the difference between bingo-based electronic games and Las Vegas-style slot machines would "cripple" economic development by tribes.

This is the first congressional field hearing on the proposed changes to Class II gaming, which have been in the works for five years.

U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, D-Muskogee, scheduled the hearing, held at Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College in Miami. It drew about 200 people, mainly tribal representatives and attorneys.

Witnesses included officials from several tribes, the city of Miami and the federal agency that regulates the industry.

Miami and Ottawa County, with 10 Indian gaming locations, stand to be affected by the proposed rules more than virtually any other Oklahoma community.

Both Cole and Boren sit on the House Natural Resources Committee, which oversees American Indian matters. They were the only House members present, although others sent staffers.

The issue is especially important in Oklahoma, which had 59 percent of all the tribe-run Class II machines in the country as of December 2006.

Millions of dollars a year are at stake not only for tribes, but also for the state of Oklahoma, which receives a cut from all Class III machines, but nothing from Class II games. That money goes toward teacher pay raises and other education programs.

Most industry experts say the proposals would force Oklahoma tribes to go exclusively to compacted games.

'Devastating' impact feared

The proposed rules include a five-year grandfather period, meaning all existing machines would remain legal until at least 2013. Virtually all existing Class II games would become illegal at that point.

Some witnesses said the proposed rules would render Class II machines obsolete, because those that fit the proposed specifications would become so unappealing that few gamblers would use them.

Both Cole and Boren expressed concerns about the regulations.

During questioning of Norm DesRosiers, vice chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, Boren said tribes have spent "millions and millions of dollars investing in these machines." He cited a recent impact study that said more than 3,000 jobs could be lost if the restrictions are imposed.

Cole, a Chickasaw Nation member, said he finds the proposed definitions "deeply troubling."

"The impact on Indian country would be devastating," Cole said.

He called the proposal "a solution in search of a problem."

Oklahoma moving toward compacted games

The industry is governed by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. DesRosiers said the creators of that law didn't envision the technology that has blurred the difference between Class II and Class III machines.

Class III gaming cannot be conducted without a state compact. Class II requires no such agreement.

The proposed Class II clarification prompted Oklahoma tribes to support a law passed by voters in late 2004, which authorized Class III compacts.

Since then, tribes have migrated toward Class III machines. Tribes pay the state 4 to 6 percent of the revenue from those machines. In the first seven months of this fiscal year, that generated $37.2 million for the state.

DesRosiers said Oklahoma is moving quickly toward a total Class III market. The state's 50,000 gambling machines are split about equally between Class II and Class III, he said.

Cole repeatedly asked DesRosiers why the changes are needed, when most Oklahoma tribes are migrating toward Class III.

DesRosiers said the rule definitions are needed because tribes in several other states don't have Class III compacts.


 


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford

starting a franchise business
This is your franchise opportunity! Become a PuroClean pro today.
www.PuroClean.com/franchise

Young Father Makes It Big
From Corporate Burnout To 2-3hrs A Day & Multiple 6 Figures At Home.
www.thekeytofinancialfreedom.com

shareView All

Buzz Up!


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Patti I agree with you, as a Member of the Chickasaw Nation, I have to say that the Land Run Was Illegal, Because the Land was Promised to us "as Long as the Grass grows and the Waters Flow" And plus, the Indian Removal Act was Illegal as well.
Jason, Purcell - Feb 21, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Let's see...losing money from taxes, so gee, guess we'd better get it back from the casinos. Now, tell me again, the lottery was supposed to fund what??? and to Percy, perhaps you should read your history books, son. The self-reliant pioneers of this state are called sooners, because they couldn't even wait for the official opening of the so-called "land run" to take land that had been given to the natives.
patti, el reno - Feb 20, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Bryan, from Ada. Please remember the sweeping changes made to bankruptcy law, making it harder to file Ch. 7.
John, Oklahoma City - Feb 20, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
If Tom Cole is a member of the United States Congress and a member of the Chickasaw Legislature, which one is he representing here? The self reliant pioneers of this state wouldn't be all that upset to see the Indians getting scalped for a change. Make that our "bald" self-reliant pioneers. And white people do have gambling parlors. They are not called casinos; they are called the stock market. Getting scalped there, too.
Percy, Ardmore - Feb 20, 2008 at 5:56 pm
The tribes are becoming like the old-time gangsters in that they dole out enough charity from their haul to smooth over much of the resistance that might otherwise arise. Don't be fooled for a moment that any generosity, especially outside the tribe, is not calculated goodwill purchasing. The tribes negotiated that Compact because of the changes they knew were coming, but rather than fork over the 4-5%, many of them are trying to keep it all. Instead of ten casinos in Miami, maybe there will only be nine. Boren and Cole are more concerned about tribal profits than state revenue, that's obvious. Both were elected in campaigns financed primarily by tribal interests. Those newer "Class II" machines are just a means to get around the Compact. Makes me wonder how much money the tribes are funneling to the campaigns of anti-gambling Texas State Senators.
Floyd R, Purtle - Feb 20, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Kevin I already know the answer. For whatever reason, bankruptcy has declined. However, I'm sad to see that you think the state should protect people who choose to gable from themselves. That's called a nanny state. Welcome to Okalhoma in the 21st century. The self reliant pioneers of this State are rolling over in their graves.

The Chickasaw Nation does wonderful things with tribal revenue from casinos. A friend of ours (WHITE) left an abusive relationship with help from the Chickasaw Nation. She and her child are safe, happy and she is productive because of their help. Without it, she would have been financially unable to get out.

Ada owes a large debt of gratitude to the Chickasaws.
Bryan, Oklahoma City - Feb 20, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Why doesn't Oklahoma have REAL casinos like other states? It amazes me that we don't allow 'evil' things like dice or roulette wheels but we are the ONLY state that allows our high school senoirs (18 years old) to go blow there college money. Will the hypocricy ever end here?!?!?! Lets just go to real casinos and watch the tourists flock here instead of Vegas or Tunica!
Brad, Oklahoma City - Feb 20, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Brad
Kevin, if you don't gamble--then its obviously not your problem. I will explain this time and time again--would you (the average non-Indian citizen) rather pay more TAXES to support tribal social programs, or allow tribes to support themselves autonomously through business enterprises (and thereby creating more jobs in rural Oklahoma in the process)? Seems like a pretty easy decision for me.
Chris, Dallas - Feb 20, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Obviously, as a Chickasaw member, then, Cole must be receiving money from the Chickasaws to 'look into this matter,' and it would appear Boren has similar interests. If that be the case, then what do they call it, the fox guarding the henhouse? How much gambling( and personal bankruptcies) can Oklahoma support, anyway? It would be interesting to see how much bankruptcy has risen in Oklahoma since gambling began to flourish in Indian Country.
Kevin, Oklahoma City - Feb 20, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    News Photo Galleriesview all