The Oklahoman Editorial
TAIWAN'S president-elect,
Ma Ying-jeou, campaigned on promises of a tightrope-like walk in relations with mainland
China. Ma will be inaugurated in May, but already plans are being made to delicately position
Taiwan in the space between seeking independence and unification with
China.
Ma certainly will change the tone in Taipei. By winning 58 percent of Saturday's vote, he has a significant mandate for seeking a comfortable relationship with
China while rejuvenating relations with the
United States and other historic allies, which Ma and his party believe were unnecessarily strained by outgoing
President Chen Shui-bian's bold pushes for independence.
Ma believes
Taiwan and
China can go back to a one-
China — with differing interpretations — construct that was the status quo much of the 1990s. It's an agree-to-disagree on the finer points of what "one
China” means. "Our basic policy is to pursue peace on the basis of ‘three nos': no unification, no independence and no use of force,” Ma said before the vote.
As tenuous as it seems, the tricky balance mostly worked before
China began threatening forced unification while under Chen's leadership
Taiwan talked of independence. Both failed, Ma said.
The question is whether
Taiwan and
China can go back. The
United States hopes so. It has historic and strategic commitments to
Taiwan but also growing economic ties with
China.
Daily realities of economy and trade certainly argue for a workable, practical relationship between
Taiwan and
China. The two engage in about $125 billion a year in trade, and Taiwanese business investment on the mainland continues to grow.
Economic concerns over political principle? It has worked for people on both sides of the
Taiwan Straits before, and there seems to be no good reason it couldn't again.