What's next for Texas' superhighway?
What's next for Texas' superhighway?

Comments Comment on this article12

By Nolan Clay
Published: April 20, 2008

For years, Texas has been planning a privately financed super turnpike from Mexico to the Oklahoma border.

Advertisement

But like rush-hour traffic, the plan for a Trans-Texas Corridor is only inching along.

"It ran into a firestorm of controversy in Texas,” said Neal McCaleb, a former Oklahoma transportation secretary.

Critics have a wide range of concerns about the corridor, which has a key stretch that would parallel Interstate 35. (Another stretch would extend from the Texarkana/Shreveport area to Mexico.)

Particularly upset are landowners who may be in the corridor's path.

The Texas Transportation Department calls many concerns myths. The department says, for instance, that property owners will be paid fair market value and entire towns will not be wiped out.

How would it affect Oklahoma?
Still, the critics, including former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, got the attention of Texas legislators. Last year, legislators approved a partial moratorium on private toll road deals.

How the corridor — if it ever is built in Texas — would affect Oklahoma is unclear.

McCaleb was a consultant for a company that was seeking to build the corridor along I-35. The company proposed extending the corridor through Oklahoma.

"The Oklahoma arm never got off the ground because our proposal was not selected. And the other proposals had no provision for anything in Oklahoma,” McCaleb said.

‘There's a lot of misinformation'
Oklahoma transportation officials say they have no plans to extend the corridor through Oklahoma. They say existing roads could be used to take the traffic.

Oklahoma officials also say most of the planning in Texas is on the stretch of corridor between Dallas and San Antonio.

"It appears to be that's where their focus is,” said David C. Streb, engineering director for the Oklahoma Transportation Department. "These things take a long time.”

Streb said of the criticism, "There's a lot of misinformation.”

Oklahomans organize opposition to plan
Opponents of the corridor going into Oklahoma already have organized. A group, Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise, incorporated last year.

"We heard of all the various problems with it,” said George Wallace, president of the group. "In Oklahoma ... at least 33,000 acres would be taken by eminent domain. ... It will be a private company running this and they can set their tolls at whatever they want.”

Wallace is skeptical of claims the corridor may not be built in Oklahoma.

"The corridors that we're talking about in Texas are up to 1,200 feet wide,” Wallace said. "They have lanes dedicated to trucks, lanes dedicated to passenger vehicles, rail lines, power lines, water lines, oil lines ... Let's say it comes up to the Red River. Is it just going to stop?

"Doesn't make much sense, right?”

Nolan Clay, Staff Writer


 


Toolbar sponsored by: David Stanley Ford

Hugh Downs Reports:
Natural discovery lowers high blood pressure and cuts artery plaque.
www.bottomlinesecrets.com

Junkmycar.com
Read this Towing & Wrecking Service's reviews & find Auto Info.
Oklahomacity.Citysearch.com

shareView All

Buzz Up!


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Highways for shipping goods is insanity at it's best. Rail transport is 400+ miles per gallon per ton of transport. Semi's get 6-10 MPG and carry about 5 tons. For the same load that's 80 MPG for the train vs 6-10 MPG for a truck. What costs more for both fuel and the economy?
Doug, Midwest City - Apr 26, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Doug
as soon as the bush is out of office then the price of oil will go back down
Brandon, Oklahoma City - Apr 23, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Evan is right. The only thing he got wrong was the price of oil. How about $150 a barrel this summer?
Brer Rabbit, Briar Patch - Apr 21, 2008 at 2:45 pm
You folks up in Oklahoma had best get ready for what is heading your way. The devil is in the details with this Trans Texas Corridor. It will go from Mexico to Canada eventually if the business community get their way. They are NOT interested in using existing right of ways, because what they really want is a wide new right of way so that they can controll the concession rights. Yes that's right. Folks whos land would border the corridor would not have any concession access to the highway to place gas stations or any type of business, making the property value of bordering land go way down, as you would have a hard time selling anything next to a corridor that you couldn't access. Our Texas Governor Rick Perry went around our Texas Congress and negioated the proposed contract in secret. We never got to vote on the TTC, and they dont want us to vote as they know the cash cow corridor they are trying to setup for the Governor's business constituents would never pass. It is just inheritantly wrong to force a private land owner to sell their land to a private business using eminent domain. In this case with the corridors, the private business is a FOREIGN business construction company called Cintra. The foreign company would own the toll road, controll concessions, and set and collect the tolls. They cannot be held accountable at the voting booth if they deliver poor road maintenance or raise tolls too high. These collected tolls would leave the country instead of being used for future highways. That's bull crap.
What I have said here only scratches the surface of what big construction business is trying to set up at the American's expense. There is much more here that does not readily meet the eye that involves China using the corridors to import to the U.S. using Mexican ports and trucks, bypassing our Ammerican ports and truckers. That translates to more lost jobs for Americans. China is now investing billions in Mexican ports. Like I said, the devil is in the details on this corridor. Get informed Okies and fight this together with us Texicans.
Bob, Wallis - Apr 21, 2008 at 12:40 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bob
By the way... I realize the TTC is a private enterprise project. However, seeing how private/public enterprise has been skewed in recent years, I can see how we might start seeing public funds used to subsidize private industry. Remember the state capitol dome?
Evan, Norman - Apr 21, 2008 at 8:50 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Evan
If this road is ever built, it will likely not be used as intended and would be a grand waste of energy/resources. Diesel fuel is already over $4.00 in most parts of the nation. Oil is at $117 a barrel. Long haul transportation of freight by road is horribly inefficient.

The reason long haul trucking exists at all is the fact that the nation turned away from the railroads back in the 1950's as Eisenhower planned and implemented construction of the National Defense Highway system, (aka... our federally supported interstate highway network). This system is based upon what he saw in Nazi Germany during WWII. However, when was the last time we needed our interstate system for such? The railroads still carry implements of destruction to their various ports for overseas delivery. Why? because the military does not want equipment half used when it reaches the battlefield.

Private investors, such as Warren Buffet, are now investing in true private corporations such as the railroads. It would make more sense to plow your treasures into railroads at this point, even with the USDOT/ODOT/TxDOT imbalance skewed toward the construction of new roads for use by the interstate trucking industry some rational thought must prevail. The taxpayers and users of our existing roads will be forced to wake up when oil reaches $125 a barrel this summer.

Transportation imbalance must end. Hopefully our nation's addiction to foreign oil is ending. Change is hard and those who plan our state/national transportation networks need to wake up and find solutions to our national transportation crisis.
Evan, Norman - Apr 21, 2008 at 8:47 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Evan
What is David Streb doing commenting on the Trans Texas Corridor? At last count, Streb -- who spent years diverting, deflecting and confusing citizen input on the death-wish for Oklahoma known as the "New Crosstown project" -- was an assistant director at ODOT. ODOT is supposed to be "the public roads" -- not the turnpikes. Here's how it is: ODOT exists to serve the highway contractors and the trucking lobby. Period. It no longer serves the people of the state of Oklahoma. It, instead, participates in trying to use most folks' ignorance of the intricacies of transportation policy against them. This article might make a really good starting place for a much needed, comprehensive federal grand jury investigation of ODOT -- including puppetmaster Neal McCaleb. When ODOT "director" Gary Ridley is "talking," look closely. The hairy hand you see inside the Ridley puppet's mouth belongs to Neal McCaleb -- who personally presided over the methodical destruction of Oklahoma's roadways over the last 30 years, apparently for his own enjoyment, and for the enrichment of himself and his highway contractor friends. You can always tell when these people are lying. "Their mouths are moving."
Glenn, Moore - Apr 20, 2008 at 8:26 pm
Wow, Sean, you contribute so much to these forums.
Do you have anything else in your comeback repertoire besides "(insert name here), you're an idiot"?
Probably not.
Why do you even bother?
Jeff, Oklahoma City - Apr 20, 2008 at 12:23 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jeff
I love how "conservatives" moan and groan about the government taking their money, but when a private company wants to build a road without tax money, everybody is up in arms.
Andrew, Jefferson Park - Apr 20, 2008 at 11:43 am
A simpler and less costly solution would be to build a 3rd lane on all interstate hwys. and not allow trucks in this lane. There is ample room for construction in the current rights-of-ways.
A. J. Johnson, Jr. Ardmore
Aaron, Ardmore - Apr 20, 2008 at 8:35 am
My thanks to Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise. It is a relief that organizations like this one will not let Oklahomans be misled and sold out like the neighbors to the south. Since when does a private & FOREIGN company get to control the roads in OUR country? Does anyone think transportation costs...gas alone...is too high?
smark, Oklahoma City - Apr 20, 2008 at 4:40 am

    News Photo Galleriesview all