When Sonics move, don't let guilt move, too
When Sonics move, don't let guilt move, too
Comments
100
By Berry Tramel
Published: July 2, 2008
The guilt trip will come soon, either about 6 o'clock tonight or in a couple of years, depending on how Judge Marsha Pechman rules in the SuperSonics trial.
When the Sonics come to Oklahoma City, most everyone west of Spokane and lots of folks east of there will look at OKC and quote Gomer Pyle. Shame, shame, shame! Shame on Oklahoma City for swiping the Sonics from the loving arms of Seattle. Shame on Oklahoma City for not waiting on an expansion team. Don't buy it. Don't listen to it. Don't let anyone spoil your celebration. Don't let anyone make you feel guilty. Because here's what major-league ballteams do. They move. Always have, always will. Of the 122 major-league franchises in the four historic team sports, 40 have relocated, a total of 52 times. And if you discount the 24 expansion teams that have sprouted since 1992, it's 38 relocations in 98 franchises. There is no divine right to keeping a franchise. A team is not intellectual property, no matter how attached a populace grows. Sports are big business. They've always been big business, in this century and the previous century and even the century before that. The original Baltimore Orioles moved to New York in 1903 and eventually became the Yankees. The original Milwaukee Brewers moved to St. Louis in 1902 and became the Browns, then half a century later filled the void in Baltimore. Eight franchises moved in the '50s, 11 in the '60s, nine in the '70s, seven in the '80s and eight in the '90s. Every city left behind put up a fuss, and railed against the scoundrel owner who engineered the move, and claimed the world is unjust. But franchises aren't forever. Los Angeles has lost three pro football teams in the last 50 years. The Chargers moved to San Diego. The Raiders back to Oakland. The Rams to St. Louis. If the NFL can leave Greater Los Angeles, where's the calamity in the NBA leaving Seattle? The Seattle crowd likes to warn Oklahoma City that if Clay Bennett can put the screws to Seattle, he will do the same thing to his hometown. Maybe. Maybe not. Frankly, I'm not all that interested in a history lesson from a city that built a new palace for the Seahawks and a new palace for the Mariners and then wants to start lecturing other cities, warning them about the dangers of giving into disgruntled franchise owners. I understand the anguish over losing a franchise. Most of America does. Only Indiana cheered when the Colts left Baltimore. Only Tennessee celebrated when the Oilers left Houston. George Shinn made few friends beyond Bourbon Street when he took his Hornets out of Charlotte. But sports fans have short memories. For all the despair over the Dodgers leaving Brooklyn, baseball took to LA and LA took to baseball immediately, and the Los Angeles Dodgers quickly became a brand to rival all but the Yankees. It seemed nutty for the NHL to leave Minneapolis in 1993 for the football-mad Sun Belt, but who today can imagine hockey without a team in Dallas? Who declares the Ravens, a decade after fleeing Cleveland, are invalid in Baltimore? Nationally, no one seems to be paying much attention anyway. Their take is elementary: Oh, the Sonics are leaving for Oklahoma City? That must mean Bennett is a sorry-dog owner. But did you catch ESPN's Stuart Scott during the NBA Draft coverage? He said the "vote” to determine the Sonics' status could come later that night. There is no vote, and it wasn't true anyway. Scott even asked Jeff Van Gundy if the Sonics could make the playoffs next season, which means one of ESPN's primary NBA hosts doesn't have a clue about anything regarding Seattle basketball. When the Sonics come to Oklahoma City, outrage and lament will reign for about 15 minutes. Then everyone will move on. The rest is up to us. Fill the Ford Center and support the NBA and critics will scram in search of another franchise threatening to move. And there will be one to fit that description, because that's what franchises do.
Related Topics:
Basketball, Sports, Baseball, Football, Men's Professional Basketball, Professional Football, Professional Baseball

Prev


Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
This article is nothing but a justification for devious behaviour by owners taking Oklahoma for a ride, and yet Oklahoma is so excited for this team that they're letting themselves be a screwed over as Seattle was. If not more so. It's like a kid getting a new car his paying for, too inexperienced to realize the cost.
I want to make a quick point that so much has been made about OKC vs. Seattle. Let me express as a Sonics fan and a Washington resident that I have nothing against the city or the fans in OKC. Hell, I don't even have anything against Mr. Bennet and his ownership group. I'll admit that I'm upset that the Sonics are leaving and that it seems that they never truly wanted the team to stay in Seattle, but I don't hold it against them. I can't say that I would have done any different if I were in their shoes.
I will say that I'm a bit concerned with all of the political wrangling that went on with this who deal. The NBA, Mr. Bennet and particularly the City of Seattle have proven that the NBA and its owners care very little about the actual fans and only about money. I know its a business...I get that, but knowing that doesn't make me any less upset when my team leaves town because they didn't get a shiny new stadium.
As a fan I sad the team is gone, but their is nothing I can do about it but accept it and move on. I did all I could as a fan to keep the team here, I went to games, I bought hats and jerseys, I wrote city and state officals to plead the case of the fans, but I'm just a fan. All I can do is mourn the loss of my beloved Sonics and hope that the OKC fans never have to feel this way. Like Mr. Tramel said, any sports team can pick up and move at any time, so all I can do is say, treat the team right and don't give them any reason to leave.
Good luck,
A sad fan.
Do you think Bennett looked at any other cities, got bids and chose the location that made the most economic sense? Of course not. It wasn't about business, it was only about his ego.
Bennett's goal from the beginning was to get the team to OKC, regardless of how much money it cost. In fact, he intentionally lost money to make his case. And Darth Stern was in on the scam the whole time.
_________________________________________________________________
http://www.newsok.com/article/3265341
_________________________________________________________________
Now that Seattle lawsuit has been settled, the NBA is on its way here to stay (July 3, 2008)
_________________________________________________________________
“I think somebody is going to have to pinch me to think this day is really here,” Cornett said. “If I had a concern — and my tongue is not in my cheek — I’m concerned WE DON’T HAVE ENOUGH SEATS in that arena. I think the season ticket sales are going to blow the roof off the building.”
_________________________________________________________________
They are already gearing up for the demands for a new arena (due to inadequate seating) and we haven’t even started making the improvements or collected one penny of the $100 million yet. Maybe they can alter the plans and increase seating somehow. Otherwise, we are flushing $100 million down the improved Ford toilets.