MAPS 3 ballot won’t detail individual projects

BY JOHN ESTUS Published: November 8, 2009
The first MAPS ballot in 1993 listed each of the proposed projects in a single-question, all-or-nothing proposition, but that ballot may have been improper, according to numerous attorneys.

A state law commonly referred to as the single subject rule forbids cities from asking voters to approve one tax for multiple purposes. Voters must vote on tax-funded projects one project at a time.

"Someone probably could have challenged the original MAPS as violating the single subject rule, but no one really did,” said City Attorney Kenny Jordan.

The law is why the MAPS 3 ballot will look dramatically different from its predecessors.

Oklahoma City Council members kept specific projects off the MAPS 3 ballot. They instead opted to describe the projects as general "capital improvements” in a single question, all-or-nothing ballot that asks voters to let the city to enact a tax to pay for those improvements.

The ordinance council members passed in September to set the Dec. 8 vote was bundled with a resolution outlining how to spend the $777 million the sales tax would be expected to generate. Resolutions are nonbinding and can be overturned by a city council vote.

Such an approach to a ballot is unusual in Oklahoma, said Andrew Spiropoulos, a law professor at Oklahoma City University and director of the Center for the Study of State Constitutional Law and Government. Ongoing coverage: MAPS 3

Trending Now


  1. 1
    Spavinaw police chief arrested on lewd molestation complaints
  2. 2
    Jaguars owner Shad Khan: Team won't cut ties with Justin Blackmon
  3. 3
    Jaguars should cut Justin Blackmon says ESPN writer
  4. 4
    Report: Two Texas football players charged with sexual assault
  5. 5
    Conservative feminists find their voice
+ show more