Energy independence: It would impact U.S. military policy, expert says
The United States military has been involved in two wars, one in the oil-rich Middle East, and actively patrols and monitors oil choke points throughout the world. Energy independence could change both arrangements.
The United States' military spending and priorities would be drastically different if the country were no longer dependent on imported oil, according to retired Marine Maj. Gen. Anthony Jackson.
Videoview all videos
Oct 3Oct. 3, 2012: The Oklahoman's energy reporters lead a...
Sep 28Clytie Bunyan, business editor of The Oklahoman, provides...
Sep 28Steve Agee, dean of the Meinders school of business at...
Sep 28Harold Hamm, CEO of Continental Resources, talks about...
Photoview all 20 photos
NewsOK Related Articles
“We have spent both in national treasure and in lives a tremendous amount of our defense establishment as a result of protecting the flow of oil,” Jackson said.
The United States military has been involved in two wars in the oil-rich Middle East and actively patrols and monitors oil shipping routes throughout the world. Energy independence could change both arrangements, Jackson said.
Jackson recently retired after 36 years of service, most recently as commander of Marine Installations West, which includes all Marine Corps bases in the western United States.
While oil is only one of many reasons the United States is involved in wars half a world away, Jackson said the fuel has a dramatic effect on how the country handles those conflicts.
“We would look at it differently if the Western nations were not so reliant on fossil fuels,” Jackson said. “It would allow us to take a more balanced look at our foreign policy.”
The United States spent $7.3 trillion defending the Persian Gulf from 1976 to 2007 and is now spending $50 billion a year securing access to Middle Eastern oil, according to a 2010 study by the Milken Institute.
Even if the United States were self-reliant, the country likely still would be heavily involved in the Middle East, Jackson said. But the focus could be more diplomatic and less militaristic.
“The negotiation table would help us solve more problems in the Middle East than our conflict because we wouldn't have something vital to the American and Western economies that we are trying to defend,” he said. “It would significantly reshape our foreign policy with respect to the Middle East.”