Share “Firefighters union official: Problems with...”

Firefighters union official: Problems with cookie-cutter approach to pension reform

BY PHIL SIPE Published: November 24, 2012
Advertisement

The comprehensive pension reform for municipal employees proposed by the Oklahoma Municipal League's Carolyn Stager (Point of View, Nov. 10) falls short of considering other relevant factors. A cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all approach won't work when other important facts should be considered.

Not all municipal employees are alike in terms of their job functions and hours worked. Firefighters perform a very difficult, stressful job that's physically demanding and requires long hours as compared with other municipal employees. On the average, firefighters, because of their 24-hour schedule, work 2,912 hours annually. That's 832 more hours per year than 8-hour municipal employees who work 2,080 hours per year. Over the course of a 25-year career, this translates into roughly 10 years of additional labor, and yet city pension contributions aren't based on hours worked.

More time on the job as a firefighter naturally creates more wear and tear on the human body, more accumulated stress and a much higher probability for injury. The state doesn't need older firefighters.

Other problems with OML's approach include:

“Minimum retirement age” must include considerations for the maximum allowed age when employed and at the point of retirement. Firefighting is a job best performed by the young.

Consideration must be given to the fact that firefighters won't get Social Security benefits like other municipal employees. Their pension is all they'll have; therefore, defined contribution plans won't work for firefighters. This must also be considered when discussing changes to the Deferred Retirement Option Plan.

Continue reading this story on the...