Oklahoma Dems have reasons to gripe about some GOP proposals

 
The Oklahoman Editorial | Published: March 18, 2013    Comment on this article Leave a comment

CONCERNS voiced by Democrats in the Oklahoma House of Representatives about the work being done — or not done — by Republicans shouldn't be dismissed as sour grapes from a party toiling under a GOP supermajority. Democrats have some good reasons to be bothered.

NewsOK Related Articles

No one in Republican leadership seems to have an interest in using a bond issue to responsibly repair the Capitol building, or build a new medical examiner's office, or take care of other pressing state infrastructure needs. Instead they argue that all debt is bad debt, and that Oklahoma isn't about to travel the same path as politicians in Washington. So bond issues are off the table.

House Speaker T.W. Shannon, R-Lawton, recently wrote that borrowing $200 million would cost the state $80 million in interest over two decades. “Only in government does it make sense to pay $280 million for something that costs $200 million,” he wrote. Apparently GOP lawmakers don't hold mortgages on their homes. If they've found mortgage companies that don't charge interest, we'd like to know who they are.

A bill that would outlaw text-messaging while driving — something 39 other states have found to be worthwhile — can't get off high center in the House. But if you've got a bill that won't add up to a hill of beans but will allow the most conservative GOP members to preen, step right up!

This is how we wind up with a measure like the Freedom Firearms Act, which would exempt guns or ammunition made in Oklahoma from federal regulations so long as those items remain in Oklahoma. Hailed as a sign that we're a gun-friendly state, the bill passed by a 79-12 margin in the House.

It's how we wind up with the House approving, by a 72-20 vote, a bill that would have the Legislature declare that the Affordable Care Act isn't authorized by the U.S. Constitution. The author, Rep. Mike Ritze, R-Broken Arrow, said Obamacare is an example of federal overreach. He's right. It's an awful law. But it's the law of the land, approved by Congress and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Page 1 of 2




If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.


New Rule in VIRGINIA:
(MAY 2013): If You Pay For Car Insurance You Better Read This...
www.ConsumerFinanceDaily.com
Woman is 57 But Looks 25
Mom reveals simple wrinkle secret that has angered doctors...
www.HealthJournalsReview.com

Voices Photo Galleriesview all