Argument against 'paltry' income tax cut ignores long-term benefits

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: May 3, 2013
Advertisement
;

SEEMS like every liberal commentary we read these days about state government takes a swipe at the pending income tax cut. If only Gov. Mary Fallin and legislative leaders wouldn't cut taxes, so many programs wouldn't suffer!

The list of such programs is long and includes headliners such as common schools, higher ed, corrections, highways and social services, but also a host of “lesser” programs. The argument goes that anything the state funds will be hurt by a tax cut. But according to the folks making this argument, these same programs were suffering mightily when the top income tax rate was above 6 percent.

Now that it's headed below 5 percent, the end is surely nigh for government programs. Well, not quite. Tax-cut supporters point to revenue gains after recent cuts. Budget reductions in the recent recession resulted from a poor economy, not tax policy. Just ask the high-tax states that made dramatic cuts while also raising taxes.

Another argument against the GOP tax cut centers on the paltry amount that average taxpayers will realize. It is a paltry amount — say $50 to $100 per household — but this ignores what taxpayers have been saving since the tax-cutting began and what they'll save over the long term. If the short-term paltry argument is valid, so is the long-term not-so-paltry argument.

Still, we won't make the case that the latest cut is essential. But it is small and its implementation is deferred. Some of the saved income tax money will be spent for goods and thus generate sales tax revenue.

The anti-tax cut Oklahoma Policy Institute released a survey Tuesday showing a lack of support for the latest cut. The survey invoked class warfare and used loaded questions designed to push a particular response. No surprise. Advocacy group polls, whether left or right in nature, always do this. The survey-based conclusion from OK Policy is that Oklahomans don't support a tax cut that will really help only the “rich” while cutting funds for education by tens of millions of dollars.

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Dave Chappelle Reveals Shockingly Buff New Look
  2. 2
    Peaches Geldof Funeral to Be Held on Easter Monday
  3. 3
    Mayor Who Fired Lesbian Police Chief Caught On Tape In Homophobic Tirade
  4. 4
    NBA commissioner wants to raise age limit to 20
  5. 5
    Dream guitars I wouldn't mind calling my own (34 Photos)
+ show more