Oklahoma lawmaker's concerns are for naught


Published: November 24, 2012 by Owen Canfield Comment on this article Leave a comment

The state Supreme Court this week said a proposed $25 million bond issue for the Zink Dam in Tulsa was unconstitutional because it essentially was a gift to the city. State Sen. Patrick Anderson, R-Enid, who had challenged the plan, said he hoped that “in the future … policymakers will pay closer attention to the state constitution.”

But Anderson’s concerns are for naught, at least as they pertain to bond issues.

The Republican-controlled Legislature has made it abundantly clear it wants nothing to do with increasing the state’s bonded indebtedness. As a result, proposals to use bond issues for truly worthwhile projects, such as repair of the Capitol and construction of a new state medical examiner’s office, have been rejected.

With the GOP adding members in the House and Senate with this year’s elections, that sentiment isn’t about to change.



If you prefer your thoughts to appear in The Oklahoman's Opinion section, we encourage you to submit a letter to the editor.

Advertisement




× Next Story