Share “Alaska Editorials”

Published on NewsOK Modified: July 6, 2015 at 4:10 pm •  Published: July 6, 2015

Here is a sampling of editorial opinions from Alaska newspapers:

June 30, 2015

Ketchikan Daily News: Buy local

Alaskans want a way out of the state's current deficit spending situation, and one will be forthcoming; it has to be.

But, in the meantime, there's something that every Alaskan can do immediately to help the state and the communities — buy local.

Gov. Bill Walker says he intends to begin a "buy local" campaign in the state. It isn't an original idea, as Walker acknowledges, but it's one that can be effective in Alaskans supporting Alaskans and Alaska.

Ketchikan periodically pushes "buy local," often during the Christmas gift-buying-and-giving season. It will come up at other times, too; for example, when the Alaska Permanent Fund checks are distributed by the state to Alaskans annually in October.

The biggest competition for many Alaska businesses is Internet shopping. Internet-based companies make it easy; it isn't necessary to go out in the rain, burn automobile fuel, wait in lines or really move more than one's fingers. To get from store to store is a matter of a few key strokes.

That's convenience. But, it has its down sides. First, it burns next to no calories. Second, and more seriously, it sends Alaska's dollars to support jobs and economies in other states, which undoubtedly they appreciate.

But, it's our state and our community economies in need of the money. Our communities have bills to pay — public safety, infrastructure such as water and sewer lines, highway and road maintenance, providing utilities. It all costs, and every time we buy local, we support our own services. Businesses can pay their share for these community necessities, too, when we do business with them.

Certainly, many items are available and are purchased locally. But some items or services simply aren't available in smaller towns and cities. But they might be in larger Alaska cities. And, of course, they are in other states.

But making every effort to buy local is like putting savings into our own account instead of into someone else's. That's what Alaska needs to do now more than ever.


July 1, 2015

Alaska Journal of Commerce: Walker pulls rug from under explorers

Oh, the vagaries of print journalism.

Our original cover story for this Oil & Gas Reporter was a profile of Corri Feige, the new director of the state Oil and Gas Division, and her effort to put the welcome mat out for new explorers coming to Alaska.

After Gov. Bill Walker's announcement June 30 that he was vetoing $200 million in tax credits for explorers with no tax liability, that headline quickly became obsolete.

The subject of another article in this issue — an Australian-Houston venture to drill an exploration in a North Slope shale play — could also become moot based on Walker's announcement to "start a discussion" about exploration credits by using his veto to delay payment of $200 million for which companies may be eligible.

The venture by 88 Energy had just secured $50 million from Bank of America on June 24 to finance the project, and our reporter Tim Bradner wrote the effort could be eligible for up to 85 percent of its costs covered through the state exploration credit program. It's unknown at this point what the impact of Walker's decision will be on that project, but it's not likely to be positive.

Consider what Revenue Commissioner Randy Hoffbeck told the Senate Finance Committee Back on Jan. 28 after Walker first flagged the issue of the tax credits as "unsustainable" in a Jan. 8 opinion article.

"Investments in the future, when you don't have much revenue, are painful. But they're still investments in the future," Hoffbeck said.

According to the Associated Press report on the hearing, "Hoffbeck said there is no systemic problem with the credits themselves. He said this is a cash-flow issue, driven by low prices."

It wouldn't be the first time that Walker and his staff haven't been on the same page. Later in the session, members of his team who'd been briefed on the Alaska LNG Project told legislators they were pleased with what they'd learned.

That night, Walker dropped another op-ed expressing his goal to pursue a parallel, expanded state-owned gas pipeline project in case the Alaska LNG Project did not proceed.

Thankfully, the Legislature killed Walker's pipe dream by reappropriating money from the Alaska Gasline Development Corp. to prevent any funds from being spent on a competing project to AK LNG.

Once again, Walker has done what he seems to do best: throw uncertainty at the state's most important industry in the name of populist pandering.

Although he claimed the opposite at his July 1 press conference, Walker had plenty of time and opportunity to weigh in on whether to shore up the budget deficit by capping or delaying credit payments to explorers — an idea Democrats were pushing nonstop — but he waited until now to do it.

It is true that everyone in the state will feel the squeeze of budget cuts, but it is also true that agencies have also had plenty of time and opportunity to prepare for how to absorb them.

What Walker's action does is give pause to any company operating now or considering investing in the state because they'll have no idea what the rules of the game will be or when the next time they will change without warning.

And some folks — like the governor — wonder why the major Slope producers are making fiscal certainty on oil and gas taxes the keystone of any decision to proceed with the Alaska LNG Project.



  1. 1
    Down Payment Programs Not a Scam, FHA to Tell HUD Watchdog
  2. 2
    13 Fascinating Careers You Never Knew Barbie Had
  3. 3
    University of Phoenix Going Down in Flames?
  4. 4
    OKC man arrested after allegedly trying to set up meeting to have sex with minor
  5. 5
    Hoping to become tourist haunt, Nevada town finds boost in spirits
+ show more


× Trending energy Article