Court upholds sale of polygamous church assets

Associated Press Modified: November 5, 2012 at 7:16 pm •  Published: November 5, 2012
Advertisement
;

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Monday that a polygamist sect on the Utah-Arizona border waited too long to challenge a court-ordered takeover, clearing the way for state authorities to break up a church trust and sell assets including homes, businesses and farms in two small towns.

A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a federal judge in Salt Lake City, who ruled nearly two years ago that Utah's takeover violated the constitutional rights of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. U.S. District Judge Dee Benson's decision had frozen the sale of church assets in Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Ariz., and put Utah's takeover in limbo.

Utah seized control of the community trust in 2005 amid allegations of mismanagement by church officials, including now-jailed polygamist sect leader Warren Jeffs.

The appeals court panel didn't rule on the constitutionality issue. Instead, it determined the FLDS waited too long — nearly three years — to take legal action.

The FLDS sued the attorneys general of Utah and Arizona, along with the Utah district judge overseeing the takeover and the fiduciary appointed to break up the church trust, Bruce Wisan. The first lawsuit was filed in state courts in 2008, but as the church waited for a decision it took a similar case to federal court. Ultimately, the Utah Supreme Court ruled the church was too late to file a claim anywhere— not because it missed a fixed deadline but because changes had been made to the church trust that could not be undone.

The 10th Circuit panel said it was taking guidance from the Utah Supreme Court.

"We conclude that the FLDS Association is precluded from pursuing its claims in federal court," said the decision by judges Mary Briscoe, Bobby Baldock and Timothy Tymkovich. "The FLDS Association has waited nearly three years from the date the state district court modified the UEP (United Effort Plan) Trust to challenge its modification and, in the interim, transactions have occurred and other parties have acted in reliance on the trust's modification."

Continue reading this story on the...