Questions and answers regarding NHL lockout

Published on NewsOK Modified: January 5, 2013 at 3:32 pm •  Published: January 5, 2013
Advertisement
;

NEW YORK (AP) — The NHL lockout is well over 100 days long, and yet it is still hard to tell whether the league and the players' association are all that close to a deal to save the hockey season. Unlike eight years ago, when a lockout caused the cancellation of the entire season, the issues keeping the sides apart this time are mostly financially based disputes and not a philosophical divide as was the salary cap debate then.

So what exactly is putting another hockey season on the brink of ruin? The NHL already is the only North American major professional sports league to lose a whole year because of a labor dispute. It certainly would like to avoid doing it twice.

Q: What are the major issues still keeping the sides apart?

A: There are a variety of things that need to be resolved. They range from a pension plan, to the maximum length of player contracts, the annual salary difference in multiyear contracts, the salary cap amount for the 2013-14 season, and the length of the new collective bargaining agreement. The sides seem to be willing to agree to a 10-year deal, but there is disagreement as to whether to have an opt-out clause after seven years or eight.

Q: Is this the first time there has been labor unrest in hockey?

A: This is the fourth time in 20 years that labor issues affected a season. A lockout in 1994-95 was resolved in time for the NHL to stage a 48-game season after a settlement in January. The 2004-05 season was canceled completely because of a lockout, marking the first time the Stanley Cup wasn't awarded since 1919. NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman has said he won't stage a season with fewer than 48 games. He said an agreement with the union would have to be reached by Jan. 11 for that to happen this season.

Q: How does this lockout differ from the one eight years ago?

A: Back in 2004 and 2005, the NHL was willing to lose an entire season to have a salary-cap system instituted for the first time, which the league wanted to provide cost certainty for all 30 teams. The original salary cap in the 2005-06 season was $39 million, and it rose to $64.3 million last season. After the NHL generated record revenues of $3.3 billion last season, the cap for the 2012-13 season was set at $70.2 million. In the previous agreement, teams also were required to reach a minimum payroll amount of $16 million below the upper range of the cap. Players had received 57 percent of hockey-related revenue under the deal that expired in September. It is believed the split would be 50-50 in the new agreement.

Continue reading this story on the...