LETTER TO THE EDITOR


Please provide the following information

Dear Editor Mail






Required Fields*

WHAT WE LOOK FOR

  1. Brevity and focus. Cover your topic in the fewest possible words. Get to your main point quickly. Stay focused on your key points.
  2. Readability. Readers are attracted to short sentences. Avoid using too many numbers and prepositional phrases. Avoid cliches. Follow common rules of punctuation, grammar and spelling.
  3. Timeliness. Send your letter while the topic is timely, but not so quickly that you don't review what you have written before sending the letter.
  4. Fairness. Make your points on the merits rather than emotion. Avoid disparaging a group of people based solely on the actions of one member of that group.

WHAT WE DON'T PUBLISH

  1. Poetry or rhyme in any form.
  2. Most consumer complaints.
  3. Form letters or generic Web site letters.
  4. Most "thank you" letters.
  5. "Open" letters to government officials.
  6. Letters written for a class assignment or as part of an organized letter-writing campaign.
  7. Most sports-related letters. (Send these to The Oklahoman's sports editor.)
  8. Letters that have been published elsewhere or letters submitted to other publications.
  9. Letters written in an overly informal style.


REQUIREMENTS

  1. Full name, address, and email. (Your address and e-mail are needed for verification. They will not be published.)
  2. Maximum length of 250 words.
  3. Authors limited to one letter every 28-42 days, depending on volume.
  4. When referring to a news story or previous letter published, cite the headline or letter writer's name and the date of publication.



WHY WE EDIT LETTERS

Editing is done for the benefit of our readers. We make every attempt to preserve the writer's essential meaning. Editing for length allows us to accept a greater number of letters. Letters most likely to be edited are those that are twice as long as needed to make a point and those that try to make too many points.

Your Views

  • I am not ashamed!

    Published: Sat, Jul 4, 2015

    Regarding the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision to remove the Ten Commandments monument from the state Capitol grounds: I agree in part with Brady Henderson, legal director of the ACLU of Oklahoma, who said, “it isn’t the government’s business to tell us what is right or wrong choices when it...

  • Your Views

    Published: Sat, Jul 4, 2015

    Ten Commandments are ingrained in our culture

  • Don’t blame the state Supreme Court

    Published: Sat, Jul 4, 2015

      Removing the Ten Commandments monument from the state Capitol grounds forces dormant Christians to wake up. But before there’s a call to action, there needs to be recognition of reality. The court’s hands were tied. When one looks to the insipid language — “benefit” any “system of...

  • Courageous move

    Published: Sat, Jul 4, 2015

    The seven members of the state Supreme Court who joined in the decision to declare unconstitutional the Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the Capitol should be recognized for their courage. It took guts for seven elected judges to follow the clear mandate of Article II, Section 5 of...

  • Trampling on an institution

    Published: Fri, Jul 3, 2015

      U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts noted that there was no real judicial or constitutional foundation for the court’s decision to legalize gay marriage. Yet the effect of the decision is to impose on all 50 states this new legal definition of marriage, including those states...

  • Border security is critical

    Published: Fri, Jul 3, 2015

      All of us are saddened by the recent passing of Bob Barry Jr. due to a senseless tragedy. The driver who made the U-turn that claimed Barry’s life had been “voluntarily returned” to Mexico three times since 2010. Extra security protecting our borders is more critical than ever. With the...

  • Term limits needed for Supreme Court justices

    Published: Fri, Jul 3, 2015

    On July 4, 2010, you published my letter regarding the need for term limits for the Supreme Court.  After the two decisions from the court last week, I again suggest that term limits need to be enacted for justices of the Supreme Court. It seems they no longer view the court as a third...

  • A smokescreen for ridicule

    Published: Wed, Jul 1, 2015

    Regarding “For officials, things to name before ‘I do’ is new dilemma” (Our Views, June 28): This editorial about the evolving legal nomenclature for gay spouses concludes, “Better to choose adjectives as you would screen unwelcome visitors such as ‘Thing One’ and ‘Thing Two.’” This analogy,...