Audit of Oklahoma City's American Indian Cultural Center shows board selected most expensive options

An audit released Wednesday does not show any wrongdoing or misspending on behalf of the board overseeing the unfinished and unfunded American Indian Cultural Center and Museum.
BY MEGAN ROLLAND mrolland@opubco.com Modified: October 17, 2012 at 9:43 pm •  Published: October 17, 2012

Board members overseeing the half-completed American Indian Cultural Center and Museum frequently selected the most expensive plans even as funding lagged, but there is no evidence of financial wrongdoing, said the state auditor.

“The board chose the most expensive of six proposals presented by its architect,” State Auditor Gary Jones said in a prepared statement. “They decided to build a $169 million facility when only $5 million in funding had been secured. Throughout the years, although additional funding was not forthcoming, the board maintained its commitment to the most expensive plan.”

The audit of the Native American Cultural and Educational Authority, released Wednesday, details how the costs of the still-unfinished museum have ballooned out of control since the state agency's inception in 1994.

“The project has existed in some form for eighteen years, during which time more than $97 million in state funding has been used for its purpose,” the audit found.

The state has provided $71 million for the building and more than $26 million to the agency for operations and debt payment, according to the audit.

Another $80 million is still needed to complete the project, said Blake Wade, executive director of the authority. That would bring the overall price of the project, including federal, state and private funds, to $170 million.

He said the audit, despite the criticism of past decisions, is an important step in acquiring both private and public support to complete the very visible museum just off Interstate 40 on Eastern Avenue.

“Overall, I'm very delighted that we have finally gotten through this state audit,” Wade said. “To realize that we had no financial wrongdoing … is very pleasing to me personally and professionally.”

And Wade said it was pleasing to the private donors who have committed $40 million to complete the project, contingent on a $40 million match by state government.

“The donors are assured their money is being accounted for,” he said. “We have one more chance to get this match from the state. I'm very optimistic.”

Wade said if lawmakers approve funding for the project by the last half of the next session — April or May — the museum can still be completed by the ambitious December 2014 goal.

“I will never ask for another dollar,” he said.

The audit was requested by Gov. Mary Fallin after pressure from lawmakers opposed to giving more state money to the stalled project.

A news release from Fallin's office said the governor was still supportive of the project Wednesday and that a half-built facility on prime property was a wasted opportunity.

“There are many factors that have led to these outcomes and the delays in the project's completion have in turn wasted taxpayer resources due to increased materials costs, as well as delaying the generation of revenue,” the emailed statement said. “However, with the addition of new leadership last year, Governor Fallin feels the NACEA has begun to correct many of the issues addressed in the audit.”

Not convinced is longtime opponent of the project, Sen. Patrick Anderson, R-Enid, who led opposition in the Senate last year to a proposed $40 million bond issue to fund the project. The proposal was defeated by a single vote in the Senate, making it the third time additional funding for the museum has been rejected.

Continue reading this story on the...


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Extinction countdown: Only 6 northern white rhinos left
  2. 2
    VIDEO: Man carried to safety as home goes up in flames
  3. 3
    Misty Upham's father says she fell to her death trying to flee police
  4. 4
    Pope Francis: 'God is not afraid of new things'
  5. 5
    KOKH: Car vs. Uber vs. Lyft: Which is a better deal in Oklahoma City?
+ show more