Share “Audit should end talk of Oklahoma City...”

Audit should end talk of Oklahoma City bombing fund being mismanaged

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Published: March 24, 2013

WHEN complaints surfaced last year about an Oklahoma City bombing relief fund, we urged readers to keep an open mind, pending release of an audit.

Release of the audit last week should put to rest any notions that the fund has been mismanaged. But of course it won't put those notions to rest because a small but vocal group of professional victims will remain vocal.

The audit concluded that the “overwhelming majority” of assistance requests were approved. A few bombing survivors may have legitimate beefs, but nothing in the audit supports claims of mismanagement. A key finding is that the fund's purpose was not to be — as the professional victims seem to think — a compensation kitty to be divvied up among victims and survivors of victims.

Instead, the fund has the narrow purpose of paying for the health care and educational needs of survivors. This makes it different from compensation paid to survivors of 9/11 victims, a government payout designed to stave off lawsuits against the airlines affected by the terrorist attacks. When the bombing fund strayed from its primary purpose, it did so to aid victims and survivors of natural disasters such as the Joplin, Mo., tornado outbreak in 2011.

A latter-day brouhaha over the bombing fund surfaced in sensationalized media reports featuring the professional victims class. Fund managers were always at a disadvantage in this dispute because they're limited in what they can say about individual cases, owing to privacy restrictions. The public is naturally sympathetic to the victims.

This attitude boiled over after an NBC News report on the fund. Viewer comments posted on NBC's website revealed a cluelessness about the purpose of the fund and its professional administration by the Oklahoma City Community Foundation.

The fund's narrow mission makes it vulnerable to criticism. Victims denied a claim (or given less than that to which they feel entitled) are easy marks for network news programs. Even those with a more objective view of the fund were surprised to hear that the foundation is “sitting on” $10 million, which represents remaining donations to the fund and the interest earned on the principal.

Continue reading this story on the...

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


  1. 1
    Jim Jordan: Republicans 'forfeit before the ref blows the whistle' | Washington Examiner
  2. 2
    Google Parent Company Alphabet Drops 'Don't Be Evil' Motto
  3. 3
    Four more 'Transformers' movies are coming in the next 10 years
  4. 4
    What It's Like to Be an Interior Designer for Really, Really Rich People
  5. 5
    Will the Supreme Court Decide That Democrats Have Too Much Power?
+ show more


× Trending opinion Article