Autism study doesn't focus on insurance
Health: Discussion at Capitol frustrates some parents
Autism study in Oklahoma doesn't focus on insurance
Comments
18
By Michael McNutt
Published: September 26, 2008
A House committee wrapped up its interim study on autism Thursday, hearing about a pilot project to teach autistic children, a proposed autism research center and an early diagnosis program in Shawnee that its founder says can spot neurological disorders in the first year of a child's life.
Only one person talked about insurance coverage of behavioral and therapy programs for children with autism, which frustrated many of the 30 or so parents of autistic children who attended the four-hour meeting at the state Capitol. "I was hoping they would spend some time on the reason this whole thing started, and that was regarding insurance coverage known as ‘Nick's Law,'” said Wayne Rohde of Edmond, the father of a 10-year old autistic child. "They need to address the insurance issue as one of the components.” Rep. Kris Steele, who requested the study, said the proposed autism mandate named for Rohde's son, which was blocked last session by Republican House leaders, is just one possible solution. "It's clear that the families of children with autism face significant challenges,” said Steele, R-Shawnee. "Our challenge is to determine the appropriate role state government should play in advancing policy that helps all families of children with autism.”What was discussed?
Expanding services, the need to get more public school teachers qualified to work with autistic children and a desire for more doctors to help with early diagnosis were discussed.
Dana Webb, with the state's group health insurance program, said the insurance does not exclude people with autism and it covers some medical costs of autistic children, such as behavioral and speech therapy.
Keith Geary told legislators of his plans to expand biomedical services in Oklahoma by establishing a center called Aaron's Bridge, named for his autistic child.
The Rev. Paul Zahler talked about the National Institute on Developmental Delays, which provides behavioral therapy and other treatments through everyday activities.
Bonnie McBride, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, cautioned legislators that medication and therapies that work for one autistic child may not work for another.
"We do not have a pill for autism,” she said.
Related Topics:
U.S. Government, Culture and Lifestyle, Health and Fitness, Medicine, U.S. Congressional News, Child Development, Family, Parenting, Autism

Prev

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
read some of your posts? They sting just a little. Look, if you truly know me then you know I am
familiar with the numbers. I could spout off the batting average of the 85' Atlanta Braves but that
would put us right back to here. I never called you, or anyone associated with you out about respect.
I made a generalization comment about respect within the autism circles. I have nothing but the
utmost respect for anyone who will stand before the masses and pour their hearts out about bettering
the lives of their children who struggle. I JUST HAVE QUESTIONS.
insurance WILL NOT. There simply is no catch. Now as far as the school situation goes, I don't remember commenting on that but I will oblige you on this topic. We started our child/children in a certain district that was not at all acceptable and after
being in our new home for only 6 months, we contacted a realtor and were off to a district that has been nothing but an answered prayer. An open door policy, a full time aid(if needed) and a full resource room for daily OT/PT. I could go on, but I am afraid I will vent more of my pent-up anger. I HAVE read "Nick's Law" and I still have questions if it is what would be best for our situation. I am tired of the lack of respect within the autism community. Although our children all suffer from a debilitating
disease, every family's situation is unique.
which side I will support. Talking down to parents who have fought tooth and nail to utilize the services the state provides and verbally browbeating all who oppose, much less question you. Then placing horns and pitchforks on the entire republican party. Whose flag I fly doesn't matter, but you need to know that your voice is as big a part of "Nick's Law"
as Wayne, Sen. Gumm or Nick himself. I want nothing but the best for these children, but as a parent of a child battling this disease, it is my duty to that child to go through hell & back to do what is necessary to get the services they need. For you to call out the parents of autistic children who choose to act know and use the state services and yet still fight for betterment is disgusting. I am sorry that the WELFARE SYSTEM isn't the social club you want to be a part of, but it is the only LAW some families will be able to use. I guess the alternative is for these families to cash the checks the insurance companies send to pay their therapist and then file for bankruptcy. That won't affect the state will it? I don't care to get in a battle of wit with you....It is clear you have your shortcut to wikipedia and have mastered your word of the day toilet paper. I think you should realize that your voice is being broadcast on a much larger scale.