Clear meaning at heart of Oklahoma AG's challenge

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: July 17, 2013
Advertisement
;

The Obama administration says it won't enforce many Obamacare provisions. This may actually help Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt challenge the law in court. Pruitt's lawsuit focuses on the first Obamacare provision the administration ignored: the mandate for taxpayer subsidies to be tied to participation in a state-run exchange.

Oklahoma, like the overwhelming majority of states, opted to let the federal government set up an exchange. But the Obamcare law clearly ties subsidies to enrollment through state-run exchanges, not federally run exchanges. The administration has chosen to ignore that fact. Pruitt argues the subsidies don't apply to Oklahoma — and, therefore, neither do associated penalties.

As a large employer impacted by the law's mandates, state government has standing to challenge the law, Pruitt argues. To make his case, he's using the most damning evidence: Obama administration officials' own words.

In a new filing, Pruitt notes that when the Obama administration delayed the employer mandate, the administration “publically acknowledged that the requirements are so ‘complex' that large employers need a full year to figure out how to comply.” That's an “implicit admission” that reporting requirements and other large employer mandates “are in fact injuring large employers such as the State.”

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    VIDEO: Blake Griffin dumps water on a fan
  2. 2
    Oklahoma City Thunder: Grizzlies guard Nick Calathes calls drug suspension unfair
  3. 3
    Dave Chappelle Reveals Shockingly Buff New Look
  4. 4
    Peaches Geldof Funeral to Be Held on Easter Monday
  5. 5
    Mayor Who Fired Lesbian Police Chief Caught On Tape In Homophobic Tirade
+ show more