Cloud control: Let’s get ‘cirrus’ about budget woes
The Oklahoman Editorial
Comments
5
Published: November 4, 2009
Since Oklahoma’s personal income tax cuts are blamed for every wisp of bad economic news these days, we might as well blame them entirely for the drain on a revolving account that feeds more than a quarter of education funding.
Heck, let’s even blame them for the 37 employees the city of
Tulsa is laying off. Or for potholes, barking dogs and scary-looking clouds. OK, that last part was silly. But it makes about as much sense as the arguments decrying personal income tax cuts.
The education revolving fund is nearly empty, signaling more overcast days for schools. This fund is fed by a variety of sources, only one of which is the personal income tax. Sales taxes also go into the fund; they were off by $58.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The sales tax rate hasn’t been cut, but collections have plummeted.
Another source for the 1017 fund is corporate income taxes, which brought in $37.3 million in the first quarter — less than the amount by which they dropped from the comparable period of 2009. Corporate income tax rates haven’t been cut recently, yet they’re clearly dropping.
Corporate tax collections fell by 52.2 percent; personal income tax collections dropped by "only” 16.6 percent. Yes, that’s 16.6 percent of a much higher amount than for corporate taxes, but let’s get serious. Whether a tax rate has been cut, kept the same or raised, collections have fallen.
Simply put, the economy today resembles a scary-looking cloud.
Leave a Comment
News Photo Galleriesview all
Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
Next, let’s talk about the personal income tax cuts and the half-truths in the op-ed. Yes, the downturn in the economy has influenced personal income tax collections, but so have the tax cuts. While gross production revenue (as I mentioned above) is the major shortfall, next is personal income tax receipts. The D.O. used a percentage for personal income tax declines. A 16.6% decline in a $2.2 billion dollar revenue category is pretty significant. What is not being said by the D.O. is that these tax cuts have effectively “constrained” any growth in person income tax collections when times were good. This constraint contributed to the State not having any cushion to absorb any economic downturn. When the downturn hit, State services and programs were more severely affected. While personal income tax collections probably would have been down due to the economic downturn, the tax cuts amplified this shortfall. No doubt about this. I could go on but this post is already too large.