Coalition seeks moral objection to war

Associated Press Modified: November 10, 2010 at 3:35 pm •  Published: November 10, 2010
Advertisement
;

WASHINGTON (RNS) On the eve of Veterans Day, religious leaders and veterans called for a reconsideration of conscientious objection to war, saying military members should have the right to object to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for moral reasons.

In a report issued Wednesday (Nov. 10), the Truth Commission on Conscience in War called on the military to revise its rules to include "selective conscientious objection," and urged religious leaders to address issues of conscience during wartime.

"Training has made it so that our soldiers are much more reflexive than they are reflective about things that happen on the battlefield," said the Rev. Herman Keizer, a retired Army chaplain who once oversaw chaplains in the European Command.

"And when they do get an opportunity to reflect, that's when the moral issues really begin to roll."

Jake Diliberto, an evangelical Christian who co-founded the group Veterans for Rethinking Afghanistan, believes the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have become protracted and violate just war criteria.

"Today what started as Operation Enduring Freedom has turned into Operation Enduring Obligation," said Diliberto, who served with the Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan. "I still remember my friends who got killed. I still remember their faces and I remember the Iraqis who got killed."

The report states that current rules about conscientious objection requires an objection to "war in any form," creating a conflict for those who may have specific moral objections to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"It denies freedom of religious practice and the exercise of moral conscience to those serving in the military who object to a particular war based on the moral criteria of just war, which the military itself teaches and upholds as important," the report reads.

Continue reading this story on the...