Share “Court reinstates Ky. ban on stores selling...”

Court reinstates Ky. ban on stores selling liquor

Published on NewsOK Modified: January 15, 2014 at 2:10 pm •  Published: January 15, 2014

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — The prohibition on grocery stores, gas stations and other retailers selling wine and liquor is back.

The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday reinstated the 76-year-old ban, saying it serves a legitimate purpose and doesn't violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The decision affects a variety of stores around Kentucky, including Kroger, Wal-Mart, Family Dollar and smaller grocery stores that are barred from having liquor on their shelves near staples such as bread, milk and meat.

Judge Deborah L. Cook wrote the state "indisputably maintains a legitimate interest" in reducing access to liquor and wine. Cook said the law doesn't affect the "liberty interest" of any business.

"The state's interest applies not only to the general public; minors, inexperienced and impressionable, require particular vigilance," Cook wrote in an opinion joined by judges Jane Branstedder Stranch and James G. Carr. "And the state's interest applies to abstinent citizens who, morally or practically objecting to alcohol exposure, wish to avoid retailers that sell such drinks."

A Louisville convenience store, Maxwell's Pic-Pac, and the Food with Wine Coalition challenged the ban in a 2011 lawsuit. They said the law treated them differently from package liquor stores simply because they sold food and other items. The ruling impacts only areas of Kentucky where sales of package wine and distilled spirits are currently permitted by law.

Steve Pitt, the attorney for the Food and Wine Coalition, was disappointed with the decision.

"We believe the court of appeals panel failed to consider the fact that in today's business environment there is very little difference between grocery stores, which are not able to sell wine, and drug stores, which are," Pitt said. "What may have been a rational basis for distinguishing between the two in the 1930s, when the statute was first enacted, certainly no longer exists."

Continue reading this story on the...