Court's ruling takes back state's 'gift' to Tulsa

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: November 23, 2012
Advertisement
;

Without the court's action, the Zink Dam and MAPS would have shared an important trait: Oklahoma City natives would have substantially paid for both through their taxes. Tulsans and other non-Oklahoma City residents didn't fund MAPS unless they chose to shop here. The court's ruling sends the message that Tulsans must be responsible for Tulsa. When projects are worthwhile, we hope Tulsa follows Oklahoma City's lead in the future.

More importantly, opposition to debt of any kind has made it nearly impossible to get legislative approval of bonds. If lawmakers must worry that money will be diverted to new uses after approval, future bond projects of all kinds will get even less support.

The court's ruling effectively removes that objection and makes financing true state needs a little bit easier.

| |

Advertisement


Trending Now



AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Antonin Scalia faults Sonia Sotomayor for 'doubly shameful' suggestion that Michigan voters are...
  2. 2
    The NRA Quietly Backs Down On Domestic Violence
  3. 3
    Tara Lipinski, Johnny Weir to work Kentucky Derby
  4. 4
    Oklahoma basketball: Juco guard set to visit Sooners on Wednesday
  5. 5
    Texas town ready to drink its own toilet water
+ show more