Crowe & Dunlevy's Alison Howard discusses how employers can't dump staff into health exchanges

Alison Howard says employers can’t piggyback on the individual insurance obtained through the exchange to meet health reform standards.
Oklahoman Modified: June 13, 2014 at 8:00 pm •  Published: June 12, 2014

Q&A with Alison M. Howard

IRS health coverage ruling helps protect from employer dumping

Q: What is employer dumping, and why might the IRS have been concerned?

A: Starting in 2015, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will require large employers (those with 50 or more full-time employees) to offer health coverage to all of their employees or pay a nonprovision penalty of up to $2,000 per employee per year. Many employers already sponsor health coverage and make significant contributions to the cost of coverage that aren’t taxable to employees. Apparently, in response to the ACA mandate, and in an attempt to shift health costs to the government, some employers had planned to forgo providing health coverage, accept the penalty and encourage employees to obtain individual health insurance through an exchange with the carrot of a tax-free reimbursement of some or all of the premium costs. There was concern that this dumping into exchanges would erode the employer-based health system upon which the ACA is founded.

Q: How does the new IRS ruling prevent employer dumping?

A: The ruling deincentivizes employers from sending employees to exchanges, rather than providing employer-sponsored health coverage, by penalizing an employer for making tax-free payments to employees to cover the cost of insurance obtained through an exchange. This payment arrangement, described as an employer payment plan, is deemed a group health plan. As such, the arrangement necessarily fails to satisfy ACA requirements since it can’t piggyback on the individual insurance obtained through the exchange to meet ACA standards. Accordingly, such a plan could be subject to a noncompliance excise tax of up to $100 per day per employee ($36,500 per year), which is even higher than the nonprovision penalty.

by Paula Burkes
Reporter
A 1981 journalism graduate of Oklahoma State University, Paula Burkes has more than 30 years experience writing and editing award-winning material for newspapers and healthcare, educational and telecommunications institutions in Tulsa, Oklahoma...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Jalen Saunders had to be physicially restrained during seizure
  2. 2
    Kansas City's Oklahoma Joe's restaurant taking state out of name
  3. 3
    Former prison warden present at botched execution in Arizona hired by OK DOC
  4. 4
    Multimillionaire CEO Caught On Tape Kicking Puppy (GRAPHIC VIDEO)
  5. 5
    Kevin Durant-Under Armour-Nike: The latest in the KD shoe saga
+ show more