Not sure why people are saying the Thunder doesn't need the pick this year. That makes no sense to me. I say get the pick, get a player in here and get him acclimated as soon as possible, or use it to land a veteran. Either way, I'm not much of a fan of waiting on picks. Most importantly, Toronto is likely to get better, not worse. This year is the best shot the Thunder has at a top five pick. If it's in the top three this year (which Toronto would keep), next year could be 10-14. Is that really what you want? I'd prefer this year's fourth or fifth overall pick as opposed to next year's 12th. But that's just me.
Was Aldrich not a hard worker? Thabeet's rapid improvement in the "Thunder program" to me is a glaring indictment of Aldrich, who had a couple of years in the program and never did improve.
Aldrich got caught in a numbers game. First, James Harden's contract number. Then, the numbers to make the trade work. And finally, the number that is his salary, which for this team had become to big for a backup center. He worked extremely hard and was improving. He just never got a chance to show it.
Are the Jordan Brand shoes their own company, or are they a part of Nike?
It's a subsidiary of Nike. But it's sort of like it's own company.
So you think Martin likely won't be re-signed which means he will be flipped for something. Do you see Martin (maybe picks) being flipped for the deadline or after?
No. Martin is here to stay. The team is investing a lot of time in figuring out how to best use him. The Thunder isn't just going to blow up all that progress in February.
If the Thunder were to make a trade for some bench help who would get minutes taken away from them?
Probably Sefolosha and Durant. Those are the two guys currently being forced to play minutes with the second unit.
But there is no way that Martin gets 12 per from anybody on his new deal is there?
Of course I want to say no way. But with the way these owners and GMs are making decisions, I wouldn't be surprised.
Do you think the Thunder can lure any name free agents this summer? Who should the Thunder target and why?
I've got a name for you. Seems every week we do this I have another one. J.J. Redick. The guy is like Kevin Martin lite. And he's probably guaranteed to be available at a lower number than Martin. He's slightly younger, just as good of a shooter, if not better and has improved his all-around game over the years. Oh, and he's a typical high-character Presti type guy. It makes sense on a lot of levels.
Could the Thunder find any use for the Jimmer?
Maybe. Teams always need specialists like Jimmer. But based on how Cook was used, I'm not sure Brooks would use Jimmer.
Any chance the Thunder loses Sefolosha anytime in the near future due to money?
No. He's not going to command a ton from anybody. And he's shown in the past that he wants to stay here even if it means sacrificing the potential for more money.
If a move is in the plans, who are some players around the league that Presti will be targeting to maybe add a little more to the roster for a Championship run this year?
My gut tells me that a move is not currently in the plans.
Should the LAL be worried? Or do they just need to get the final playoff spot?
Until Steve Nash returns, I'm reserving judgment.
Does Collison feel more comfortable with his shooting now that he is expected to contribute on that end?
He's been working on it the past two summers and wants to be more aggressive. I think that's what has him feeling more comfortable.
Have you seen the Barclays Center yet? Is it nice? How does it compare to Orlando's new arena?
I'm sitting in the media room at the arena now. But I haven't seen much of the arena yet. I will try to get here early tonight and take a little tour.
Do you see K-Mart's Defense as better, worse, or “as-advertised”?
So far, I'd say better. Because the way it was "advertised," you'd think he was the Thunder would get outscored every minute he was on the floor. He's been OK so far.
Can we expect to see Lamb playing a major scoring role in the playoffs this year or years to come?
Seems like in the NBA people have a pretty good idea of who will be the top 2-3 teams in each conference at the beginning of the year with few exceptions while other leagues seem to be more wide open. Why is that?
Parity in other leagues, and stars in the NBA having more of a dominant impact than stars in other sports.
Who do you have in the WCF?
I don't know. Spurs-Thunder.
I am glad that Maynor wasn't signed to a 16-20 million 4-year extension in the summer.
Yup. Great point. Good thing Presti waited. He hasn't gotten any credit for that. But he should, although in fairness the Harden situation was preventing him from being able to do it.
If you could make a starting 5 with Laker-style money, whom would you pick and why? This generation of players only.
Simple. Chris Paul. Kobe Bryant. Kevin Durant. LeBron James. Dwight Howard. They're the best players at their positions.
I think a veteran point guard/ combo guard will be added after the trade deadline. One that has bought out there contract. What do you think?
It's possible. But, again, the money has to be right. In this case, it'd have to essentially be minimum contract since the Thunder wouldn't be losing any salary. That tax monster is a beast.
If Martin were to be out of the Thunder's price range in the summer, what other affordable free agents would be available that the Thunder might look at for that 6th man role?
J.J. Redick. But I'd start him.
If you had Presti's ear, who would you want to try and trade for and why?
This year, his hands are tied because of the tax. I'm not dodging the question. I'm just giving you real analysis. The Thunder's team salary is such that any move could put them over the tax and force them in three years to have to pay the repeater tax.
If the Thunder could do it all over again, do you think they would have built this franchise around Durant/Harden instead of Durant/Westbrook?
The answer is no.
Have Lamb and Jones been a disappointment, not being ready for the NBA game? And is management worry about them ever making an impact for the team?
No. They're rookies.
Do you think Westbrook will be at this level all the season and PO?
It'll be hard, but I wouldn't doubt Wolverine.
Your thoughts on Lamb's 33 points on his 1st game with Tulsa. Seems like he has a lot of upside offensively. Does he need to improve his defensive skills?
Yes. A lot.
Does Westbrook remind you of a young Michael Jordan?
Not sure I'd say that.
Brooks has been playing small ball less during this current run of wins. Will that turn into fool's gold for what he thinks is best? I just don't think he likes the smaller lineup as much as I do.
He goes to it when he needs scoring. But he knows it's a lineup that gives up rebounds and allows even more second-chance opportunities. So it's a give and take.
If Thabo was moved to the 2nd unit, do you think he would score more or just defend and defer?
I think he would feel like he is able to score more.
Ibaka has really impressed me with his jumper and getting his average close to 15 per game. Is he the best wide open shooter on the team?
Best wide open midrange shooter, yes. But let me tell you about these two Kevins I know ...
What was the rationale for the Thunder valuing Westbrook (who is a lesser player) over Harden?
One guy has proved his ability to take over games consistently and dominate throughout. The other guy was a great No. 3 option on this team. I don't think it's even a question who the Thunder should have kept given the salary demands.
Worth noting in Lamb's 33 point performance was that it took 33 shots. Dude went 13-33. Should we be worried that he is a chucker?
I wouldn't say he's a chucker. Far from it. Even in college he was passive at times and established a rep for disappearing. But he does have a lot to learn about how to score.
What are these people talking about? Give me Wolverine over the Beard any day of the week. Do they not remember the Finals?
And about 50 other examples.
Do you agree that right now Harden is the better player over Westbrook?
As I've written elsewhere, Harden might be the better player but not the more dominant one. He's more complete and smarter than Westbrook. But you can't deny Westbrook's impact on this team, from everything to his mentality to his toughness to his stat-stuffing.
That's a wrap. Thanks for joining me today folks. We'll do it again next week. Don't forget to join us Thursday at 1:30 p.m. at NewsOK.com/live for a Google+ Hangout. Have a great week.