Share “Edmond family shocked by appeals court ruling”

Edmond family shocked by appeals court ruling

Parents of 1st Lt. Michael Behenna, of Edmond, OK, convicted in 2009 of murdering an Iraqi civilian, thanked supporters and said they will pursue all possible legal avenues to bring justice to their son.
BY ZEKE CAMPFIELD Published: July 6, 2012

The family of an Edmond soldier convicted in 2009 of murdering an Iraqi civilian said they are surprised and devastated by Thursday's decision by a military appeals court to uphold his 15-year prison sentence.

At a news conference in downtown Oklahoma City on Friday, Scott and Vicki Behenna thanked supporters and said they will continue to pursue all possible legal avenues to bring their son home.

The news conference came a day after U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forced upheld 3-2 a lower court's decision to convict 1st Lt. Michael Behenna on a charge of unpremeditated murder in a combat zone for his role in the death of suspected terrorist Ali Mansur.

“I just talked to Michael's lawyers — they want to file a motion to reconsider with the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces that will be filed, I think, within 10 days,” said Vicki Behenna, a federal prosecutor in Oklahoma City. “We also are looking at the option of whether or not we can file a writ of certiorari before the United States Supreme Court. Those decisions will be made in the next couple of weeks.”

Between tears and flanked by her husband, two sons and a daughter-in-law, Behenna said her son's spirits remain high despite the court's ruling.

Behenna has been in custody at a military prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kan., since he was convicted at a 2009 court-martial. In his appeal, Behenna argued the judge in the court-martial mangled the instructions to the jury and that evidence that should have been turned over by prosecutors was withheld instead.

Family believes soldier acted in self-defense

In Thursday's opinion, a majority of the appellate court judges said they agreed with the defense's contentions but that the missteps were irrelevant in convicting Behenna.

The court said Behenna lost his right to claim self-defense when he pointed his gun at the unarmed and naked prisoner and because the interrogation was not authorized.

Continue reading this story on the... has disabled the comments for this article.

Trending Now


  1. 1
    What color is this dress: Gold and white or blue and black?
  2. 2
    Lawsuit claims jailer raped two former Ottawa County Jail detainees
  3. 3
    While Inhofe throws snowball, little town in Oklahoma plays big role in climate debate
  4. 4
    The planned hotels for downtown Tulsa are still coming -- mostly
  5. 5
    Confessions of a cruise ship crew member
+ show more