Part of Picher's legacy will be its toxicity.
"In 100 years, where is that (mine) water going to go?” resident David Ray said. "It eventually will get into Grand Lake, and it eventually will get into the aquifer. Water has a mind of its own. It simply goes.”
Featured Video
Advertisement
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will continue working in Picher, at the Tar Creek Superfund Site, for at least another 30 years, said John Meyer, the agency's remedial site project manager. So far, the agency has spent at least $150 million on cleanup at Tar Creek. Another $167 million is planned.
That money will go toward clearing out the mountains of toxic mine tailings, since the agency has done tests that say it's safe to turn the gravel into material that's used in road construction.
People who own the lead-laced gravel, many of them Quapaw Indians, will get money as they sell it to asphalt companies, Meyer said. All of the mountains must be gone in 30 years, Meyer said, but the work will be far from finished then.
The EPA plans to test the soil in streams from Kansas to Grand Lake, looking for heavy metals, and seeing if fish and other aquatic organisms can survive (or if they've been able to since the mines closed). If the water it's found too toxic for aquatic life, the agency may dredge the river beds to take out the toxic metals.
Or it might simply leave things alone, Meyer said, since over time, nature might be able to fix things on its own.
MAY 12, 2008
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Maybe EPA has looked around and seen that people have been living in the middle of it for thirty years and seen that there have been few, if any, ill effects to their health. Or maybe you guys think the folks that told the government all these years to stick it, they weren't leaving, were brain damaged by all the poisons there. It takes the EPA to wade in those creeks to see if anything's living there? Maybe they could go to the local middle school and ask a few of the boys there. If the EPA follows Lawrence's recommendations, $300 million will look like small change.
By the way, this quote is a little scary to me, "If the water it's found too toxic for aquatic life, the agency may dredge the river beds to take out the toxic metals.
Or it might simply leave things alone, Meyer said, since over time, nature might be able to fix things on its own". I think people should expect more than spending > 300 million dollars just to let nature take its course. Maybe Tar Creek needs a new site manager that uses the funds to clean up the superfund site. Also, I wonder will EPA let us know if they find highly toxic waste in the aquifers and in grand lake? then what - everyone in NE Oklahoma drnks bottled water for the next 50-100 years until nature finishes its course?
Lawerence, Oklahoma City - May 18, 2008 at 11:50 pm
I think EPA could come up with a better plan then that! 30 years and more - it has already been over 20 years - 50+ years to clean up a site??? that would not happen in California.
Lawerence, Oklahoma City - May 18, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Fourth of July Page
Share your July 4th photos with NewsOK and view other stories and videos.
More Info
Picher was a booming mining town in the early 1900s. Lead and zinc from the area made bullets for both World Wars. People displaced by the tornado want to take with them the history of the mining years. OKLAHOMAN ARCHIVE
Picher timeline
1916: The first mine opens in the area.
1919: City of Picher established.
1948: Several mining companies shut down operations.
1967: Two homes were swallowed by a sink hole caused by an abandoned mine shaft.
1970: The last of the Eagle Picher Mining Co. operations close.
1980: Superfund legislation signed to clean up waste sites.
1983: Tar Creek was identified as one of the most contaminated sites in the United States.
2004: A buyout of families with young children begins.
2006: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers releases a report saying one-third of Picher's 400 homes sit on top of mine shafts and tunnels, and face risk of collapsing.
2006: A voluntary buyout of the remaining residents begins.
2008: An EF-4 tornado levels most of the town of Picher.
Related to this story
Articles
Town clings to memories of good days 05/18/2008 PICHER — After last weekend's devastating tornado, everyone said this troubled town was dead. But Picher's pulse continues to beat faintly — and it will...
Tornado mayhem blamed in death 05/18/2008 PICHER — As a military wife, Chizuri Cox lived in many places, but she called the former lead and zinc mining town of Picher her home. Cox, 80, was among...
3
Featured Video
Prev
Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
Or it might simply leave things alone, Meyer said, since over time, nature might be able to fix things on its own". I think people should expect more than spending > 300 million dollars just to let nature take its course. Maybe Tar Creek needs a new site manager that uses the funds to clean up the superfund site. Also, I wonder will EPA let us know if they find highly toxic waste in the aquifers and in grand lake? then what - everyone in NE Oklahoma drnks bottled water for the next 50-100 years until nature finishes its course?