Eric Holder off base with continued campaign against state voting laws

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board Published: July 29, 2013
Advertisement
;

ON June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a portion of the federal Voting Rights Act requiring certain states to get “pre-clearance” from the Justice Department before implementing election-law changes. Obama administration officials must have been out of town that day.

Attorney General Eric Holder has announced that his Justice Department will ask a federal court to force Texas to continue obtaining preapproval from the federal government before making redistricting changes, citing other provisions of the Voting Rights Act. The announcement suggests that the administration has little respect for either the Supreme Court or lower courts — including courts that have sided with minority groups in election law disputes. That's certainly the case in Texas.

In 2011, a three-judge panel in San Antonio threw out a redistricting plan drawn by the Republican-controlled legislature. The court ultimately issued its own temporary maps to allow elections to be conducted in 2012. The Texas Legislature has since ratified the court-drawn maps to make them permanent.

In other words, Holder is now asking the courts to rule that court-drawn maps could be so tainted by racism that they should first be reviewed by his agency.

He's expected to pursue similar actions against other Southern states that are implementing voter ID laws, even though multiple studies have found these laws don't discriminate based on race; they discriminate against those not registered to vote.

Texas has a history of “pervasive voting-related discrimination against racial minorities,” Holder proclaimed. This was decades ago. The Supreme Court's decision made clear that pre-clearance requirements must be based on current evidence of racial discrimination.

That's problematic for the Obama administration. Greater racial disparities in current voting participation rates are found in Massachusetts than in many states with a Confederate history. But Massachusetts is a blue state. It gets a free pass. Texas is a Republican state and, therefore, must be subjected to endless federal harassment, even if no real evidence of minority voter suppression exists.

Continue reading this story on the...

by The Oklahoman Editorial Board
The Oklahoman Editorial Board consists of Gary Pierson, President and CEO of The Oklahoma Publishing Company; Christopher P. Reen, president and publisher of The Oklahoman; Kelly Dyer Fry, editor and vice president of news; Christy Gaylord...
+ show more


Trending Now


AROUND THE WEB

  1. 1
    Dog rescued after being stuck in hot tar
  2. 2
    AC/DC's Malcolm Young has dementia, family says
  3. 3
    'Big Brother' star reveals he is HIV positive
  4. 4
    Texas girl missing for 12 years is recovered in Mexico
  5. 5
    PHOTO: Dez Bryant poses for pictures at Texas high school homecoming
+ show more