Ex-wife wants Dodger divorce settlement tossed

Published on NewsOK Modified: April 24, 2013 at 4:11 pm •  Published: April 24, 2013

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Former Los Angeles Dodgers CEO Jamie McCourt isn't entitled to the more than $131 million she received in a divorce settlement because she agreed to the terms and her most recent claims aren't credible, an attorney for her ex-husband argued Wednesday in court.

Jamie McCourt wants the agreement thrown out because she believes she was misled about the value of the Dodgers that was later sold for $2 billion.

But Robert Sacks, a lawyer for former Dodger owner Frank McCourt, said his client's ex-wife was provided the team's financial documents prior to the settlement being reached in October 2011.

"There is not a scintilla of evidence to support Jamie's ever-changing claims," Sacks said during closing arguments of a non-jury trial. "It lacks credibility."

Jamie McCourt said her ex-husband committed fraud by misrepresenting the Dodger assets as worth less than $300 million during their divorce and he knew all along what the true value was but didn't tell her. Her attorneys believe she was short-changed roughly $770 million.

She received $131 million tax-free and several luxurious homes.

Frank McCourt's attorneys said Jamie McCourt failed to do her due diligence.

In court documents filed early in the divorce case, Jamie McCourt did estimate the value of the team, Dodger Stadium and the surrounding parking lots at $2 billion.

Jamie McCourt's attorney, Bert Fields, said his client relied on the latest figures provided to her and said the amount for a future regional sports network — potentially worth more than $1 billion — was never reflected in documents she saw.

Continue reading this story on the...