Minty said EPA has overstepped its authority by trying to regulate greenhouse gases.
“The EPA can regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds, but it does not have authority to regulate greenhouse gases. Under the provision it released today, it would regulate both,” he said Wednesday. “EPA claims the rule is intended to regulate volatile organic compounds, but a significant portion of the justification of the rule is devoted to a reduction in methane emissions.
“Methane is not a compound that is currently under Clean Air Act jurisdiction,” he said.
Two members of Oklahoma's congressional delegation also criticized the new EPA rules.
“The Obama EPA has been working aggressively to assert control over natural gas production so that they can regulate it out of existence — and this rule is just the latest in that grand scheme,” said U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa. “It's no secret that EPA has been trying hard to manufacture a correlation between groundwater contamination and hydraulic fracturing, but in each case, they were unable to find sound scientific evidence to make this link.
“So now, they're attempting to usurp control through air regulations.”
U.S. Rep. John Sullivan, R-Tulsa, said the new rules take a significant toll on independent oil and gas producers.
“When it comes to our national energy policy, this administration preaches ‘all of the above' but has practiced a ‘nothing from below' approach,” Sullivan said. “EPA's failure to consider the impact their regulatory agenda is having on jobs, domestic energy production and economic recovery keeps moving us further from our goal of powering our nation with affordable and stable sources of American-made energy.
“The oil and natural gas sitting under our feet is a precious resource that we cannot afford to ignore.”