Feds say oil trains should have two-man crews

By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Published: April 9, 2014
Advertisement
;

Responding to a series of fiery train derailments, federal regulators said Wednesday they will propose that trains transporting crude oil have at least two-man crews and requirements aimed at preventing parked train cars from coming loose and causing accidents like one in July that killed 47 people.

The Federal Railroad Administration had asked a freight rail industry advisory committee to make recommendations on whether two-man crews should be required, but the industry officials were unable to reach a consensus after working on the issue for months. Federal officials said they decided to move ahead with the two-crew member requirement anyway.

“Safety dictates that you never allow a single point of failure,” Joseph Szabo, head of the railroad administration, said in a statement.

While existing federal regulations don’t address how many crew members freight trains must have, the general practice among the largest freight railroads is to have a minimum of two crew members for trains while in service. However, regional and short-line railroads use single-man crews more often.

The crew proposal was prompted by an accident last July in the town of Lac-Megantic in Quebec, Canada. A train transporting oil from the Bakken region of North Dakota was left unattended by its lone crew member while parked near the town. The train came loose and sped downhill into Lac-Megantic. More than 60 tank cars derailed and caught fire, and several exploded, killing 47 people and destroying much of the town.

Since the Lac-Megantic accident, there have been other oil train derailments and fires in Alabama, North Dakota, and Canada.

The Association of American Railroads, which represents the freight rail industry, took strong exception to crew proposal, saying federal officials haven’t provided evidence that two-man crews are safer than a lone crew member.

Continue reading this story on the...