GOP is right to battle union-friendly "Disclose Act"
An old Washington legislative trick is the wolf-in-sheep's-clothing gig. Take a partisan interest, wrap it in virtue and push it forward, blasting opponents along the way for being against mom and apple pie.
That was part of the strategy with Democrats' legislative response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in January, freeing corporations and unions from federal restrictions on independent campaign expenditures — which President Obama criticized in his State of the Union speech a few days later.
In the name of transparency, Democrats argued the "Disclose Act" would merely require corporate political advertisers to reveal their funding sources. "Nobody's saying you can't run the ads," Obama said recently. "Just make sure that people know who in fact is behind financing these ads."
But Republicans said the legislation placed more restrictions on corporate activities than those of unions, amounting to an effort to help Democratic candidates in this fall's elections. Using a Senate filibuster, opponents blocked the bill's progress, at least for now.
Voices Photo Galleriesview all
- 83533Oklahoma tornadoes: The 'Big Dog,' the little boy and the hug that triumphs over tragedy
- 16617OKC Thunder: Kevin Durant tours Moore, meets with residents
- 12334Oklahoma tornadoes: ‘All I could do was sit there and hold her'
- 12075Clippers' Donald Sterling hints coach let go to keep Chris Paul
- 11110Oklahoma tornado: Names of dead released; missing individuals located
- 9568Oklahoma tornadoes: Red Cross text donations not designated for Oklahoma
- 8849How to help tornado victims