Pedestrians walks up stairs near a subway station at the Citigroup center location at Lexington Ave. on Friday, Nov. 21, 2008 in New York. AP Photo/Jin Lee
WASHINGTON -- Rushing to rescue Citigroup, the government agreed to shoulder hundreds of billions of dollars in possible losses at the stricken bank and to plow a fresh $20 billion into the company.
Advertisement
Regulators hope the dramatic action will bolster badly shaken confidence in the once-mighty banking giant as well as the nation's financial system, a goal that so far has been elusive despite a flurry of government interventions to battle the worst global crisis since the 1930s.
Wall Street appeared encouraged as stock futures moved higher ahead of the market opening in New York. Dow Jones industrial average futures rose almost 2 percent. Stock markets in Britain and Germany gained more than 4 percent in afternoon trading. Citigroup shares themselves climbed 44 percent to $5.64 in premarket trading.
"If they didn't help, the damage would be beyond imagination," said Teck-Kin Suan, economist at United Overseas Bank in Singapore.
The action, announced late Sunday by the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., is aimed at shoring up a huge financial institution whose collapse would wreak havoc on the already fragile financial system and the U.S. economy.
"With these transactions, the U.S. government is taking the actions necessary to strengthen the financial system and protect U.S. taxpayers and the U.S. economy," the three agencies said in a joint statement. "We will continue to use all of our resources to preserve the strength of our banking institutions, and promote the process of repair and recovery and to manage risks."
Analysts said a Citigroup failure would have seized up still fragile lending markets and caused untold losses among institutions holding debt and financial products backed by the company.
"It would create chaos," said Winson Fong, managing director at SG Asset Management in Hong Kong, which oversees about $3 billion in equities in Asia. "Simply put, you couldn't borrow or lend for a while. This is a nightmare scenario."
The bold move is the latest in a string of high-profile government bailout efforts. The Fed in March provided financial backing to JPMorgan Chase's buyout of ailing Bear Stearns. Six months later, the government was forced to take over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and throw a financial lifeline — which was recently rejiggered — to insurer American International Group.
Critics worry the actions could put billions of taxpayers' dollars in jeopardy and encourage financial companies to take excessive risk on the belief that the government will bail them out of their messes.
The Citigroup rescue came after a weekend of marathon discussions led by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, who is being tapped by President-elect Barack Obama as his Treasury chief also participated.
Vikram S. Pandit, Citi's chief executive officer, welcomed the action. "We appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market stability," he said in a statement issued early Monday.
The $20 billion cash injection by the Treasury Department will come from the $700 billion financial bailout package. The capital infusion follows an earlier one — of $25 billion — in Citigroup in which the government also received an ownership stake.
As part of the plan, Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky loans and securities backed by commercial and residential mortgages.
Under the loss-sharing arrangement, Citigroup Inc. will assume the first $29 billion in losses on the risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citigroup 10 percent. Money from the $700 billion bailout and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses. The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup.
In exchange for the guarantees, the government will get $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup. In addition, Citi said it will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for approximately 254 million shares of the company's common stock at a strike price of $10.61.
As a condition of the rescue, Citigroup is barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years unless the company obtains consent from the three federal agencies. The bank is currently paying a dividend of 16 cents, halved from a 32-cent payout in the previous quarter. The agreement also places restrictions on executive compensation, including bonuses.
Importantly, the agreement calls on Citigroup to take steps to help distressed homeowners.
Specifically, Citigroup will modify mortgages to help people avoid foreclosure along the lines of an FDIC plan that was put into effect at IndyMac Bank, a major failed savings and loan based in Pasadena, Calif.
Under the IndyMac plan, struggling home borrowers pay interest rates of about three percent for five years. Rates are reduced so that borrowers aren't paying more than 38 percent of their pretax income on housing.
The IndyMac plan also was used as a model for a new program by mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and for two other failed thrifts taken over by the government on Friday. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair has been pressing Treasury to use $24 billion from the $700 billion bailout program to put the mortgage modification program on national footing, but Paulson is opposed to that idea.
Citigroup has seen its shares lose 60 percent of their value in the past week, reflecting a crisis of confidence among skittish investors. They are worried all the risky debt on Citigroup's balance sheet will turn into losses as the economy worsens and the markets stay turbulent — losses that could be nearly impossible to reverse.
Citigroup is such a large, interconnected player in the financial system that it is seen by Washington policymakers as too big to fail. The company has operations stretching around the globe in more than 100 countries.
Analysts consider Citigroup the most vulnerable among the major U.S. banks — especially after it failed to nab Wachovia Corp., which was bought instead by Wells Fargo & Co. That was a missed opportunity for Citi to gets its hands on much-needed U.S. deposits that would bolster its cash position.
Citigroup was especially hard hit by the meltdown in risky, subprime mortgages made to people with tarnished credit or low incomes. Foreclosures on those mortgages spiked, leaving Citi and other financial companies wracking up huge losses on the soured investments. The company has failed to turn a profit during the past four quarters and has announced plans to slash thousands of jobs.
____
AP Business writers Marcy Gordon in Washington and Madlen Read in New York contributed to this report.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press.
Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Editor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on local crime or fatality stories.
A bailout of a company that makes only paper wealth is no problem, but when a company that actually creates a product (auto makers), asks for help, they are ridiculed? I bet Citi has a few corporate jets also. The foxes are leading the chickens out of the coop, while we watch. Heck, since the gov't owns everything ayway (see English Common Law, Real Property) I guess we have no choice.
I agree with you, Herron. If you can't afford your lifestyle..tough tookies. Credit cards reserve the right to increase your rate - READ THE FINE PRINT...hell, just ready ANY part of the agreement. However, I'm curious why the govt. can just swoop in and help Citibank, while they hold hearings and discussions about the auto industry. Makes me wanna go 'hmmmmmm'...
What a load of crap. This is what happens when people live above their means and banks get greedy. Let the chips fall where the may and fire everyone of these crooked #$%@$@%%.
The people aren't informed enough to know what is really going on.
They didn't know these institutions were leveraged out at 97% with a bunch of crap securities given AAA ratings by Moodys and S&P. The first group of people to go to prison should be the head of the securities ratings companies. Next, should be the crooks who paid them, under the table, to rate junk with AAA ratings.
We should all be happy now that we are "more inclusive" in our lending for home ownership. The Dems mantra a few years ago was that it was a "right" to own a home. Well, it isn't a right. It must be earned.
What galls me is that all these institutions were in cahoots with each other.
1. Mortgage brokers got people approved for loans they couldn't afford with terms that only got worse after a couple of years.
2. Financial institutions were standing in line to buy these assets. They knew many of the loans were crap but they also knew they were going further down stream so who cares?
3. The "assets" were bundled into securities and rated AAA and sold as mortgage backed securities. The ratings services were complicit because they knew the instruments were equilvalent to junk bonds. Remember Junk Bonds anyone???
4.Finally, the institutions buying these things were leveraged out with only 3 cents out of every dollar from their own capital pool.
5. When it came time to pay the piper, ie, the terms adjusted on mortgage loans the buyer was never qualified for in the first place, the mortgage holder tossed the house keys back to the lender.
6. With the cascade of this happening, the securities decline in value.
7. The financial institutions have to make up the margin with hard cash, capital. Problem is when you only put up 3 cents on every dollar on billions of dollars of crap assets, you are now officially insolvent, bankrupt.
8. But wait, lets rally the taxpayer and not inform them or what really happened. Keep them in the dark and let the taxpayer bail all the above out. I am okay with a bailout as long as the heads of all the above go to prison for fraud.
9.Unfortunately for the US taxpayer, they are kept in the dark and do not understand what is really happening. The Wall Street guys are just crooks wearing expensive suits.....
Danita, it is because some pencil-pushing geek, in order to justify his position, has deemed your financial situation as "questionable" despite your payment history. Something as simple as changing jobs or getting another loan triggers these things. It is total crap and this whole process should be "re-jiggered" (I can not believe a reporter actually used that word).
I am getting sick and tired of paying for the mis-management of these companies while I maintain my financial situation in good standing. Several things need to happen. First, any bailout should come at the expense of the top brass...PERIOD. CEO, CFO, chairmans, board members, etc should all be looking for a job. Not like they will be out of work long--just look at Carly Fiorina. She personally killed Hewlett Packard and now is a million-dollar-a-year consultant to the RNC. Second, absolutely no bonuses to ANYONE within the company should be awarded, a 10% reduction in management should be immediately implemented, and all corporate perks such as private planes and off-site business meetings must be stopped. Third, if these things are not demanded of these companies, any senator/representative that votes for approval must be held accountable by their constituents. They are banking on the typical idiot American completely forgetting about this in two/four/six year when their re-election comes up. Which will probably happen. How ANY incumbent senator/representative that voted for this crap still has a job is beyond me. It is a capitalist society...reportedly. Let them fail. Someone else will come along and pick up the pieces, not the American taxpayer. We are the laughing stock of the world right now but too stupid to recognize it.
WAKE UP people!! you are being swindled by big corporations and big government. This is the biggest rip off of the American consumer in the history of this country (and possibly recorded history).
Where is the OUTRAGE that should be displayed on the streets?
Does anyone care?
If the government is bailing them out, then why did they increase my interest rate to 19.99 when I have never been late or overlimit? If they force consumers into bankruptcy, they'll hurt themselves.
What gets me is we continue to bail out these companies that are raping the average taxpayer with high credit card interest, excessive charges, and what is this bailout doing to help those individuals!!!
Thank you for joining our conversations on NewsOK.com. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Leave a commentEditor's note: It is not our intent to offer comments on local crime or fatality stories.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).