Grand jurors reported Box first sent a letter about Prater to Assistant Attorney General Robert Hudson in February 2011. The grand jurors noted Box and Reynolds at the time were representing former pharmacist Jerome Ersland in a murder case. The defense attorneys were seeking to have Prater removed from the case.
Ersland later was convicted at trial of first-degree murder for fatally shooting a wounded robber inside a south Oklahoma City drugstore.
Grand jurors reported Box was involved in the preparation of the false statement about the party from the cafe owner. Grand jurors reported Reynolds and the cafe owner, Wade Starr, “were plainly the source of the bogus ‘invoice' that” Box sent to the attorney general's office.
Reynolds died in May of brain cancer.
The grand jury ended the report by criticizing the defense attorneys.
“More care to the cause of Justice is expected from legal professionals than was exercised here before making allegations as serious as these,” the report states. “Such actions should never be undertaken, as the facts suggest in this case, in order to obtain some possible advantage for a client in a pending case. Such actions by members of the criminal defense bar are plainly far below any reasonable expectations of the public in regard to anyone who should be professionally dedicated to defending other persons accused of crimes.
“This is particularly true of Attorney A, who is a former police officer and former prosecutor.”
Box, who is one of the best-known attorneys in Oklahoma City, testified Wednesday before the grand jury.
Told Thursday of the grand jury's criticism, Box said, “I think it's just a whitewash — prosecutors protecting prosecutors.”
Attorney denies role
Box denied having a role in preparing the cafe owner's statement about Moon paying for the party. He has said in the past he believes the statement is true.
The grand jury noted that Prater in May voluntarily filed an amended campaign report reflecting the party as $10,000 in in-kind contribution from five sponsors. The grand jury noted Prater also has repaid some of the sponsors.
“We believe these actions were intended by Mr. Prater (to), and should, remove even the appearance of impropriety from this celebration party. We commend Mr. Prater for voluntarily undertaking these actions,” the grand jury reported.