Handful of complaints shouldn't tarnish OKC Community Foundation

The Oklahoman Editorial Published: November 14, 2012

It's important to note that, as with all issues related to the bombing, these concerns about the foundation are hardly unanimous. One man whose two children required years of medical help after being seriously injured that day said the foundation has “really gone the extra mile” for his family and “is five-star, absolutely, top to bottom.”

But for a charity, while public donations are invaluable, public confidence is irreplaceable. Our concern is that the complaints about the foundation's oversight of the bombing fund could reduce citizens' confidence that cash gifts will be used as intended, which could reduce giving in future years for similar causes handled not just by the foundation — it administers about 1,300 nonprofit funds — but other organizations too.

Given the number of people affected by the bombing and the lifelong medical challenges of some survivors, it's unlikely any charitable fund could cover all associated costs for all victims for the rest of their lives. The fact there have been so few public complaints about the bombing fund during the past 17 years would seem to indicate the foundation has done its job well.

The audit will shed further light on this issue. Meantime, if legitimate demand for aid requires drawing down the bombing fund's reserves, so be it. That money will have served the purpose for which it was donated. And donors will feel greater confidence about giving to disaster relief funds.

| |


Trending Now


  1. 1
    Check out the Thunder postseason playlist
  2. 2
    VIDEO: Blake Griffin dumps water on a fan
  3. 3
    Oklahoma City Thunder: Grizzlies guard Nick Calathes calls drug suspension unfair
  4. 4
    Dave Chappelle Reveals Shockingly Buff New Look
  5. 5
    Peaches Geldof Funeral to Be Held on Easter Monday
+ show more